Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex differences in uses and perceptions of profanity

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined sex differences in perceptions and uses of profanity. Profanity is considered in terms of the strength it may impart to language and as a tool of group cohesion and nonmember alienation. Implications of these characteristics are explored in terms of observed sex differences on profanity measures. Females reported less profanity usage than males reported, and females further provided more conservative assessments of the appropriateness of profanity usage in various settings. Males more than females reported that profanity provides a demonstration of social power and serves to make the user socially acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barron, N. Sex-typed language: The production of grammatical cases. Acta Sociologica, 1971, 14(1, 2), 24–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauduin, F. Obscene language and evaluative response: An empirical study. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. The sex game. New York: Atheneum, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brend, R. Male-female intonation patterns in American English. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1975, pp. 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, P. Frequency and kinds of words in various social settings, or what the hell's going on? Pacific Sociological Review, 1969, 12, 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, P. The words college students use and what they talk about. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1970, 32, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., & Saine, T. The role of profanity and sex variables in interpersonal impression formation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1977, 2(5), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, P. Marriage and psychotherapy. In the Radical Therapist Collective (Eds.), The radical Therapist. New York: Ballantine, 1971, pp. 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleser, G., Gottschalk, L., & Watkins, J. The relationship of sex and intelligence to choice of words: A normative study of verbal behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1959, 15, 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, A. Partner influences on sex associated spoken language of children. Sex Roles, 1981, 7(9), 925–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, T. A frequency count of college and elementary school students' colloquial English. Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1981, 10, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today, 1974, 8, 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Womens' speech: Separate but unequal? In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. Language in society, 1973, 2, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. New York: Harper and Row, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. Dirty words can harm you. Redbook, 1974, 143, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, E. Dimensions of profanity. Psychological Reports, 1974, 35(1, pt. 2), 387–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markel, N., Prebor, L., & Brandt, J. Bio-social factors in dyadic communication: Sex and speaking intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A. Effects of obscene language upon three dimensions of listener attitude. Communication Monographs, 1976, 43(4), 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & Robinson, W. Talking and not talking about sex: Male and female vocabularies. Journal of Communication, 1979, 29(2), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B., & Henley, N. Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender and society. In B. Throne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1975, pp. 5–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshay, D. Sex differences in language style. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Toward a sociology of women. Lexington, MA: Xerox, 1972, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1979, 327, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. The influence of sex and knowledge of communication effectiveness on spontaneous speech. Word, 1966, 22(1–3), 112–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D., & West, C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1975, pp. 105–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communications Studies, Virginia Tech, 24084, Blacksburg, Virginia

    Gary W. Selnow

Authors
  1. Gary W. Selnow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selnow, G.W. Sex differences in uses and perceptions of profanity. Sex Roles 12, 303–312 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287597

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287597

Keywords

Search

Navigation