Skip to main content
Log in

Performance, attitudes, and professional socialization of women in academia

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Junior faculty at two universities in the Northeast were surveyed regarding their objective job performance as well as attitudes toward work, availability of role models, self-perception and self-evaluation, and incidence and type of sexual discrimination. There were no significant sex differences in marital status; however, two-thirds of the married females reported having no children, whereas less than one-third of the married males had no children. Female junior faculty reported spending somewhat more time on work-related activities at home, generally less willingness to cancel class, somewhat higher likelihood of editing books and/or journals, but less likelihood of writing books and/or journal articles. Males generally felt they were above average in comparison to their colleagues and contemporaries; and they showed a fairly accurate appraisal of their standing vis-á-vis others on the publication dimension. In contrast, females rated themselves significantly lower than the males in comparison to others and showed little discriminative judgment of their relative standing on the publication dimension. Differences in the early socialization of men and women may result in the differential professional socialization of female faculty. Subtle areas of sexual discrimination in the academic experience are suggested. Finally, the authors caution against overgeneralizing from these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W., & Panos, R. J. The educational and vocational development of college students. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H. S. The woman doctorate in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generational effects. Human Development, 1968, 11, 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardwick, J. M. Psychology of women. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. Academic women. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, G. G., & Tolor, A. Sex differences in adaptive styles. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1971, 119, 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. A., & Loeb, J. W. Performance, rewards, and perceptions of sex discrimination among male and female faculty. In J. Huber (Ed.), Changing women in a changing society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. A. Women in academe. Science, 1970, 169, 2184–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, J. E., Morlock, L., Perkins, J. A., & Tinsley, A. Women in modern language departments, 1972–1973. PMLA, 1976, 91, 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashket, E. R., Robbins, M. L., Leive, L., & Huang, A. S. The status of women microbiologists. Science, 1974, 193, 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. Sex and gender. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S. Barriers to the career choice of engineering, medicine, or science among American women. In J. M. Bardwick (Ed.), Readings on the psychology of women. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. J., Clark, S. M., & Galway, S. The woman Ph.D.: A recent profile. Social Problems, 1967, 15, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., & Labouvie-Vief, G. Conceptualizations of sex roles: A life span developmental study. Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, D. P., & Lininger, C. A. The sample survey: Theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant to the first author from the Spencer Foundation to Harvard University, Graduate School of Education. The authors wish to thank Jane Platt, Abigail Stewart, and David Winter for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Widom, C.S., Burke, B.W. Performance, attitudes, and professional socialization of women in academia. Sex Roles 4, 549–562 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287199

Keywords

Navigation