Skip to main content
Log in

The dominant Drop eye mutations of Drosophila melanogaster define two loci implicated in normal eye development

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three existing dominant gain-of-function Drop alleles, Dr 1, Dr Mioand Dr We, previously assumed to define a single locus, severely disrupt eye development. Genetic analysis of ethylmethanesulphonate (EMS) and irradiation-induced revertants revealed that the Drop mutations define two loci: the Drop locus, which is defined by the Dr 1 and Dr Mio mutants, and a separate locus defined by the Dr We mutation, which has been renamed Wedge. The majority of the Dr 1 and Dr Mio revertants are embryonic lethal in trans, mutant embryos exhibiting trachea that fail to join the Filzkörper, thus revealing a role for the Drop gene in embryogenesis. Clonal analysis of lethal revertant alleles suggests a role for both genes in eye development. In the Drop homozygous mutant clones, the outer photoreceptor cells R1–R6 develop aberrantly. Wedge, however, is not required by the developing photoreceptor cells but its absence does disrupt normal ommatidial alignment. Although the Drop and nearby string loci were shown to be genetically distinct, both Dr 1 and Dr Mio were found to interact in trans with lesions at the string locus, causing loss and derangement of bristles and loss of neuromuscular coordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker N, Rubin GM (1990) Effect on eye development of dominant mutations in Drosophila homologue of the EGF receptor. Nature 340:150–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham PM, Zachar Z (1985) Evidence that two mutations, w Dzland z 1, affecting synapsis dependent genetic behaviour of white are transcriptional regulatory mutants. Cell 40:819–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagan RL, Ready DF (1989a) The emergence of order in the Drosophila pupal retina. Dev Biol 136:346–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagan RL, Ready DF (1989b) Notch is required for successive cell decisions in the developing Drosophila retina. Genes Dev 3:1099–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Celniker SE, Lewis EB (1987) Transabdominal, a dominant mutant of the Bithorax Complex, produces a sexually dimorphic segmental transformation in Drosophila. Genes Dev 1:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar BA, O'Farrell PH (1989) Genetic control of cell division patterns in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 57:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita SC, Zipursky SL, Benzer S, Ferrús A, Shotwell SL (1982) Monoclonal antibodies against the Drosophila nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:7929–7933

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte PJ, Kankel DR (1982) Genetic analysis of mutations at the Glued locus and interacting loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 101:477–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlin U, Rubin GM (1991) Star is required in a subset of photoreceptor cells in the developing Drosophila retina and displays dosage sensitive interactions with rough. Dev Biol 144:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens G, Weigel D (1988) Terminal versus segmental development in the Drosophila embryo: the role of the homeotic gene fork head. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 197:345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens G, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1984) Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Zygotic loci on the third chromosome. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 193:283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 627

  • Lindsley DL, Zimm G (1985) The genome of D. melanogaster. Part 1: Genes A-K. Drosophila Information Service 62

  • Lindsley DL, Zimm G (1992) The genome of D. melanogaster. Part 4: Genes L-Z. Drosophila Information Service 68

  • Muller HJ (1965) New mutants. Drosophila Information Service 40:36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E, Kluding H (1984) Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Zygotic loci on the third chromosome. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 193:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfranz PJ, Benzer S (1989) Monoclonal antibody probes discriminate early and late mutant defects in development of the Drosophila retina. Dev Biol 136:411–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobels FH (1958) New mutants. Drosophila Information Service 32:84

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaroop A, Sun JW, Paco-Larsen ML, Garen A (1986) Molecular organisation and expression of the genetic locus Glued of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 6:833–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Tearly RG, Belote JM, McKeown M, Howells AJ, Baker BS (1989) Cloning and characterisation of the scarlet gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 122:595–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson A (1988) Cellular interactions in the developing Drosophila eye. Development 104:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson A, Ready DF (1987) Neuronal differentiation in the Drosophila ommatidium. Dev Biol 120:336–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Nüsslein-Vollhard C (1986) Looking at embryos. In: Roberts DB (ed) Drosophila: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 199–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tearle, R., Tomlinson, A. & Saint, R. The dominant Drop eye mutations of Drosophila melanogaster define two loci implicated in normal eye development. Molec. Gen. Genet. 244, 426–434 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286695

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286695

Key words

Navigation