Summary
An investigation of a paternal age effect independent of maternal age was undertaken for 98 cases of Down's syndrome genotypes diagnosed prenatally compared to 10,329 fetuses with normal genotype diagnosed prenatally in data reported to the New York State Chromosome Registry. The mean of the difference (delta) in paternal age of cases compared to those with normal genotypes after controlling for maternal age, was slightly negative,-0.27 with a 95% confidence interval of-1.59 to +1.06. A regression analysis was also done in which the data were first fit to an equation of the type lny=(bx+c) and then to the equation ln y=(bx+dz+c) where y = rate of Down's syndrome, x = maternal age, z = paternal age, and b, d, and c are parameters. This also revealed no evidence for a paternal age effect. The value of d (the paternal age coefficient) was in fact slightly negative,-0.0058, with an asymptotic 95% confidence interval of-0.0379 to +0.0263. Lastly, multiple applications of the Mantel-Haenszel test considering various boundaries in paternal age also revealed no statistically significant evidence for a paternal age effect independent of maternal age. These results are at variance with claims of others elsewhere of a very strong paternal age effect detected in studies at prenatal diagnoses. Five different hypotheses are suggested which may account for discrepancies among studies to date in findings on paternal age effects for Down's syndrome: (i) there are temporal, geographic, or ethnic variations in paternal age effects, (ii) there is no paternal age effect and statistical fluctuation accounts for all trends to date; (iii) methologic artifacts have obscured a paternal age effect in some studies which did not find a positive outcome; (iv) methodologic artifacts are responsible for the positive results in some studies to date; (v) there is a rather weak paternal age effect independent of maternal age in most if not all populations, but because of statistical fluctuation the results are significant only in some data sets. The results of all data sets to date which we have been able to analyze by one year intervals are consistent with a mean delta of +0.04 to +0.48 and in the value of d (the paternal age coefficient) of +0.006 to +0.017, and it appears the fifth hypothesis cannot be excluded. Projections based on this assumption are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carothers AD, Collyer S, DeMey R, Frackiewicz A (1978) Parental age and birth order in the actiology of some sex chromosome aneuploidies. Ann Hum Genet 41:277–287
Erickson JD (1978) Down's syndrome, paternal age, maternal age and birth order. Ann Hum Genet 41:289–298
Erickson JD (1979) Paternal age and Down's syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 31: 489–497
Erickson JD, Bjerkedal T (1981) Down's syndrome associated with father's age in Norway. J Med Genet 18:22–28
Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley, New York
Hansson A, Mikkelsen M (1978) The origin of the extra chromosome 21 in Down's syndrome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 20:194–203
Holmes LB (1978) Genetic counseling for the older pregnant woman: new data and questions. N Engl J Med 298:1419–1421
Hook EB (1981) Down's syndrome: Its frequency in human populations and some factors pertinent to variation in rates. In: de la Cruz FF, Gerald PS (eds) Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome): Research perspectives. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 3–67
Hook EB (1982) The epidemiology of Down syndrome. In: Pueschel SM (ed) Down syndrome: Advances in biomedicine and the behaviroal sciences. Garland-SPMM, New York
Hook EB, Chambers GC (1977) Estimated rates of Down's syndrome in livebirths by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20 to 49 in a New York study: Implications of the “risk” figures for genetic counseling and cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs. In: Bergsma D, Lowry RB, Trimble BK, Feingold M (eds) Numerical taxonomy of birth defects and polygenic disorders. Birth Defects 13:123–141
Hook EB, Lindsjö A (1978) Down's syndrome in livebirths by single year maternal age interval in a Swedish study: Comparison with results from a New York state study. Am J Hum Genet 30:19–27
Hook EB, Cross PK (1981) Temporal changes in livebirth prevalence of Down's syndrome in New York State. J Med Genet 18:29–30
Hook EB, Cross PK (1982) Interpretation of recent data pertinent to genetic counseling for Down syndrome: Maternal age specific rates, temporal trends, adjustments for paternal age, recurrence risks, risks after other cytogenetic abnormalities, recurrence risk after remarriage. In: Willey AM, Carter TP, Kelly SM, Porter IH (eds) Clinical genetics: problems in diagnosis and counseling. Academic Press, New York
Hook EB, Cross PK, Lamson SH, Regal RR, Baird PA, Uh SH (1981) Paternal age and Down syndrome in British Columbia. Am J Hum Genet 33:123–128
Jenkins RL (1933) Etiology of mongolism. Am J Dis Child 44:506
Lamson SH, Cross PK, Hook EB, Regal RR (1980) On the inadequacy of analyzing the paternal age effect on Down's syndrome rates using quinquennial data. Hum Genet 55:49–51
Lamson SH, Hook EB (1981) Comparison of mathematical models for maternal age dependence of Down's syndrome rates. Hum Genet 59:232–234
Mantel N, Stark ER (1966) Paternal age in Down's syndrome. Am J Ment Defic 71:1025
Matsunaga E, Tonomura A, Oishi H, Kikuchi Y (1978) Reexamination of paternal age effect in Down's syndrome. Hum Genet 40: 259–268
Penrose LS (1933) The relative effects of paternal and maternal age in mongolism. Genetics 27:219–224
Penrose LS, Smith GF (1966) Down's anomaly. Churchill, London, p 218
Regal RR, Cross PK, Lamson SH, Hook EB (1980) A search for evidence for a paternal age effect independent of a maternal age effect in birth certificate reports on Down's syndrome in New York State. Am J Epidemiol 112:650–655
Stene J, Fischer G, Stene E, Mikkelsen M, Petersen E (1977) Paternal age effect in Down's syndrome. Ann Hum Genet 40:299–306
Stene J, Stene E, Stengel-Rutkowski S, Murken J-D (1981) Paternal age and Down's syndrome. Data from prenatal diagnosis (DFG). Hum Genet 59:119–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hook, E.B., Cross, P.K. Paternal age and Down's syndrome genotypes diagnosed prenatally: No association in New York State data. Hum Genet 62, 167–174 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282309
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282309