Summary
The theory of sequential multi-stage index selection makes an implicit assumption that the correlation between indices at different stages is zero. This assumption was shown to result in errors in the estimation of genetic gain and in the proportion of the population selected by truncating the joint distribution of the indices. Knowledge of the means and volumes of truncated multivariate normal distributions was used to correct these estimates. Effects of selection intensity and the correlation between the first and second stage indices (ϱ) on the accuracy of the approximate sequential method were examined. Computational constraints limited this analysis to two-stage index selection procedures. The sequential method performed well for ϱ less than 0.6 but accuracy deteriorated rapidly as ϱ increased beyond this value. The effect of selection intensity on accuracy was smaller than ϱ. On a percentage basis, errors in actual percent selected and under-estimation of genetic gain increased with selection intensity while overestimation decreased. The types of errors which occur and their magnitude depend on the intensity of first stage selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartels VS, Bruns E, Glodek P (1980) Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Mehrstufenselektion bei der Züchtung von Göttinger Miniaturschweinen. Z Tierz Züchtungsbiol 97: 101–115
Cochran WG (1951) Improvement by means of selection. In: Newman J (ed) Proc 2nd Berkeley Symp Math Stat Prob, Berkley, Calif, pp 449–470
Cotterill PP, James JW (1981) Optimising two-stage independent culling selection in tree and animal breeding. Theor Appl Genet 59:67–72
Cunningham EP (1975): Multi-stage index selection. Theor Appl Genet 46:55–61
Dickerson GE, Hazel LN (1944) Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling in livestock. J Agric Res 69:459–476
Jain JP, Amble VN (1962) Improvement through selection at successive stages. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 14:88–109
Namkoong G (1970) Optimum allocation of selection intensity in two stages of truncation selection. Biometrics 26: 465–476
Saxton AM (1982) A note on a computer program for independent culling. Anim Prod 35:295–297
Tallis GM (1961) The moment generating function of the truncated multi-normal distribution. J R Stat Soc B 23:223–229
Young SSY, Weiler H (1960) Selection for two correlated traits by independent culling levels. J Genet 57:329–338
Young SSY (1964) Multi-stage selection for genetic gain. Heredity 19:131–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by D. Van Vleck
Paper No. 8157 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saxton, A.M. A comparison of exact and sequential methods in multi-stage index selection. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 66, 23–28 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281843
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281843