Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective symptoms and pharmacokinetics/dynamics of metoprolol CR in elderly subjects — a comparison with atenolol

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a double-blind, randomised, cross-over study, the pharmacokinetic/dynamic effects and subjective symptoms of a new controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol (50 and 100 mg) have been compared with atenolol (50 mg) and placebo in 20 elderly healthy subjects.

The metoprolol CR formulation displayed an even plasma concentration-time profile over the dosage interval while atenolol produced a peak at 2–4 h. All three active treatments produced significant β1-blockade at 24 h compared to placebo. Four hours after dose intake, the degree of β1-blockade was significantly greater with conventional atenolol 50 mg than with either dose of metoprolol CR. Subjective well-being was examined with a self-administered questionnaire (MSE-profile), including three dimensions: Contentment, Vitality and Sleep. No significant differences were detected between placebo and either dose of metoprolol CR. At 2 h, following atenolol, a deterioration in Vitality was observed compared to placebo and metoprolol CR 100 mg. At the end of the dosage interval there was no longer any significant difference between the treatments. Perceived leg fatigue during exercise, evaluated 4 h after dosing, was more pronounced during treatment with atenolol than metoprolol CR 50 mg.

The results suggest that the metoprolol CR formulation was not associated with significant effects on subjective well-being, whereas atenolol caused a deterioration at the time of the peak plasma concentration of the drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berglund G, Wilhelmsen L, Sannerstedt R, Hansson L, Andersson O, Sivertsson R, Wedel H, Wikstrand J (1978) Coronary heart disease after treatment of hypertension. Lancet I: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kannel WB, Gordon T (1978) Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in the elderly: The Framingham Study. Bull NY Acad Med 54: 573–591

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amery A, Hansson L, Andrén L, Gudbrandsson T, Sivertsson R, Svensson A (1981) Hypertension in the elderly. Acta Med Scand 210: 221–229

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilhelmsen L, Berglund G, Elmfeldt D (1987) Beta-blockers versus diuretics in hypertensive men: Main results from the HAPPHY trial. J Hypertens 5: 561–572

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisalo A, Heino A, Munter J (1974) The effect of alprenolol in [Suppl]: 23–31

  6. Wikstrand J, Berglund G (1982) Antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers in patients aged over 65. Br Med J 285: 850

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis RA (1983) Clinical responses to oxprenolol in the elderly. Am J Cardiol 52: 62 D-65 D

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wikstrand J, Westergren G, Berglund G, Bracchetti D, van Couter A, Feldstein CA, Ming KS, Kuramoto K, Landahl S, Meaney E, Pedersen EB, Rahn KH, Shaw J, Smith A, Waal-Manning H (1986) Antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol or hydrochlorothiazide in patients aged 60 to 75 years. Report from a double-blind international multicenter study. JAMA 255: 1304–1310

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patel L, Turner P (1981) Central actions of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in man. Med Res Revs 1: 387–410

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen RC, Kostis JB (1985) Biobehavioural sequellae associated with adrenergic-inhibiting antihypertensive agents: a critical review. Health Psychol 4: 579–604

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirk CA, Cove-Smith R (1983) A comparison between atenolol and metoprolol in respect of central nervous system side effects. Postgrad Med J 59 [Suppl 3]: 161–163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Westerlund A (1985) Central nervous system side effects with hydrophilic and lipophilic β-blockers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28 Suppl]: 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Engquist L, Andersson P-O, Hermodsson L, Lind O (1986) A comparative study of the antihypertensive efficacy and side effects of atenolol and metoprolol. Curr Ther Res 40 (2): 260–264

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koella WP (1985) CNS-related (side-) effects of β-blockers with special reference to mechanisms of action. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28 [Suppl]: 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gengo FM, Ermer JC, Carey C, Kalonaros GC, McHugh WB (1985) The relationship between serum concentrations and central nervous system actions of metoprolol. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 48: 101–106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gengo F, Fagan S, de Padova A (1988) The effect of β-blockers on mental performance on older hypertensive patients. Arch Intern Med 148: 779–784

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nicholson AN, Wright NA, Zetlein MB, Currie D, McDevitt DG (1988) Central effects of β-adrenoceptor antagonists II-electroencephalogram and body sway. Br J Clin Pharmacol 26: 129–141

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lyngstam O, Rydén L (1981) Metoprolol and atenolol administered once daily in primary hypertension: A clinical comparison of the efficacy of two selective beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents. Acta Med Scand 209: 261–266

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sandberg A, Ragnarsson G, Jonsson UE, Sjögren J (1988) Design of a multiple-unit controlled-release formulation of metoprolol-metoprolol CR. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 [Suppl]: 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sandberg A, Blomqvist I, Jonsson UE, Lundborg P (1988) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol: a comparison with conventional tablets. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 [Suppl]: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blomqvist I, Westergren G, Sandberg A, Jonsson UE, Lundborg P (1988) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol CR: a comparison with atenolol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 [Suppl]: 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  22. Löfdahl CG, Dahlöf C, Westergren G, Olofsson B, Svedmyr N (1988) Metoprolol controlled release (CR) and atenolol studied in asthmatic patients — interaction with terbutaline. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 [Suppl]: 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ervik M, Kylberg-Hanssen K, Johansson L (1986) Determination of metoprolol in plasma and urine using high-resolution gas chromatography and electron-capture detection. J Chromatogr 381: 168–174

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ervik M Kylberg-Hanssen K, Lagerström P-O (1980) Electron-capture-gas chromatographic determination of atenolol in plasma and urine, using a simplified procedure with improved selectivity. J Chromatogr 182: 341–347

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 3: 92–98

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dahlöf C, Dimenäs E, Olofsson B (1989) Documentation of an instrument for assessment of subjective CNS-related symptoms during cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 3: 919–927

    Google Scholar 

  27. Skelly JP, Barr WH (1985) Biopharmaceutic considerations in designing and evaluating novel drug delivery systems. Clin Res Practics Drug Reg Affairs 3: 501–539

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kostis JB, Rosen A (1987) Central nervous system effects of β-adrenergic blocking drugs: The role of ancillary properties. Circulation 75: 204–212

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hutchison S, Campbell LM (1983) Beta-blockers and the elderly. J Clin Hosp Pharm 8: 191–199

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chobanian AV (1983) Pathophysiologic considerations in the treatment of the elderly hypertensive patients. Am J Cardiol 52: 49 D-53 D

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reg»rdh CG, Landahl S, Larsson M, Lundborg P, Steen B, Hoffmann KJ, Lagerström PO (1983) Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and its metabolite alpha-OH-metoprolol in healthy, non-smoking elderly individuals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24: 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sabanathan K, Castleden CM, Adam HK, Ryan J, Fitzsimons TJ (1987) A comparative study of the Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride in normal young and elderly subjects and elderly hypertensive patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 32: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gengo FM, Huntoon L, McHugh WB (1987) Lipid-soluble and water-soluble β-blockers: Comparison of the central nervous system depressant effect. Arch Intern Med 147: 39–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimenäs, E.S., Dahlöf, C.G., Heibel, B. et al. Subjective symptoms and pharmacokinetics/dynamics of metoprolol CR in elderly subjects — a comparison with atenolol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38, 571–578 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278584

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278584

Key words

Navigation