Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic studies of self incompatibility in the garden chrysanthemum, Chrysanthemum morifolium ramat

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Self incompatibility was investigated in the hexaploid garden chrysanthemum, a member of Compositae. Nine sibling clones selected from a highly compatible cross were all self incompatible. 14.8% of the crosses between these sibs in diallel were compatible, but one sib, 67-111-42, accounted for 10 of the 12 compatible crosses. 67-111-42 was also more compatible than the remaining 8 sibs in crosses to other closely related plants. Crosses of the 9 sibs to 12 unrelated tester clones indicated that none were male or female sterile. Inbreeding via pseudocompatibility was successful in increasing homozygosity at the S loci. The percentage of compatible crosses obtained in 3 sib diallels of I 2 clones from crosses of 67-111-42I 1 plants approached that of the original 9 × 9 diallel, but no one individual accounted for most of the compatible crosses. It was possible to separate the 9 sibs into 9 incompatibility patterns from the pollinations made in this study. The evidence suggests that the self-incompatibility reaction in the garden chrysanthemum is sporophytic and involves more than 1 locus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Bateman, A. P.: Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. III. Cruciferae. Heredity 9, 53–68 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brewbaker, J. L.: Incompatibility in auto-tetraploid white clover. II. Dominance and double reduction. Genetics 40, 137–152 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brewer, J. G., Parlevliet, J. E.: Incompatibility as a new method for identification of pyrethrum clones. Euphytica 18, 320–325 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crowe, L. K.: Incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatus. Heredity 8, 1–11 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dowrick, G. J.: The chromosomes of chrysanthemum. II. Garden varieties. Heredity 7, 59–72 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fryxell, P. A.: Mode of reproduction of higher plants. Bot. Rev. 23, 135–233 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gerstel, D. U.: Self-incompatibility studies in guayule. II. Inheritance. Genetics 35, 482–506 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Habura, E. Ch.: ParaSterilität bei Sonnenblumen. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 37, 280–298 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes, M. B., Babcock, E. B.: Self incompatibility in Crepis foetida (L) subspecies roeadifotia (Biel) Schiz et Keller. Genetics 35, 570–588 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Imrie, B. C., Knowles, P. F.: Genetic studies of self-incompatibility in Carthamus flavescens Spreng. Crop Sci. 11, 6–9 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, D.: Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi. Adv. Genet. 6, 235–285 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lundqvist, A.: Self-incompatibility in Dactylis glomerata L. Hereditas (Lund) 61, 353–360 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, F. W.: The system of self-incompatibility in Ipomoea. J. Hered. 59, 263–267 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mulford, F. L.: Results of selfing twenty-four early blooming chrysanthemums. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 35, 818–821 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. F. Linskens

Scientific Journal Series Paper Number 7882 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.

Lyndon W. Drewlow was a National Science Foundation Trainee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drewlow, L.W., Ascher, P.D. & Widmer, R.E. Genetic studies of self incompatibility in the garden chrysanthemum, Chrysanthemum morifolium ramat. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 43, 1–5 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277824

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277824

Keywords

Navigation