Abstract
Results of shunt tap were studied in 224 clinically or radiologically suspected instances of shunt malfunction. In 130 retrospectively studied patients the results of the tap had reported the opening pressure and ease of aspiration. In 94 prospectively studies instances the shunt tap parameters described were (i) the opening pressure, (ii) the drip interval, i.e., the interval between the drops of cerebrospinal fluid when the open end of the butterfly used for tapping was placed 5 cm below the level of the valve, and (iii) the closing pressure. The efficacy of the aspiration procedure for proximal malfunction was 40.3%, compared with the efficacy of drip interval which was 95.1%. For distal malfunction, the efficacy of measurement of opening pressure was 54.3% whereas that of closing pressure was 60.6%. An in vitro model of a functioning shunt showed that the opening and the closing pressures were related to the flow rate and the level of the distal catheter tip with respect to the valve, whereas the drip interval was linearly related to the flow through the proximal catheter and was independent of the distal catheter position. The opening pressure, closing pressure, and the drip interval recorded at surgery were not significantly different from the values obtained by shunt tap. The results suggested that shunt tap accurately provides information otherwise obtained at surgery and the drip interval is most useful for evaluating a proximal malfunction. The subjective impression of the distal flow may be more helpful in diagnosing distal malfunction rather than the absolute level of opening or closing pressures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich EF, Harmann P (1990) Disconnection as a cause of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt malfunction in multicomponent shunt system. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:309–311
Andersson H, Lofgren J (1968) Hydrodynamic evaluation of shunt performance in hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 16:30–34
Drake JM, Sainte-Rose C, DaSiliva M, Hirsch JF (1991) Cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics in children with external ventricular drain. Neurosurgery 28:242–250
Ferraresi S, Griffini C, Torcello L, Cassinari V (1991) Duplicated peritoneal catheter as cause of shunt malfunction. Neurosurg Rev 14:149–150
French BN, Swanson M (1981) Radionuclide imaging shuntography for evaluation of shunt patency. Surg Neurol 16:173–189
Harbert J, Haddad D, McCullogh D (1974) Quantitation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow. Radiology 112:379
Hayden PN, Rudd TG, Shurtleff DB (1983) Combined pressure radionuclide evaluation of suspected cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction: a seven years clinical experience. Pediatrics 66:679–684
LeRoux P, Berger M, Benjamin D (1988) Abdominal X-ray and pathological findings in distal unishunt obstruction. Neurosurgery 23:749–752
Noetzel MJ, Baker RP (1984) Shunt fluid examination. Risks and benefits in the evaluation of shunt malfunction and infection. J Neurosurg 61:328–332
Pendleton BB, Pollay M, Robert PA, Hisey BN (1985) In vitro analysis of CSF shunt function by radionuclides. Child's Nerv Syst 1:152–157
Piatt JH (1992) Physical examination of patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Is there useful information in pumping the shunt? Pediatrics 89:470–473
Savolardo M, Solero CL, Passerini A, Migliavacca F (1978) Determination of cerebrospinal fluid shunt function with water soluble contrast medium. J Neurosurg 49:398–407
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sood, S., Kim, S., Ham, S.D. et al. Useful components of the shunt tap test for evaluation of shunt malfunction. Child's Nerv Syst 9, 157–161 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272267
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272267