Skip to main content
Log in

Neural correlates of the optomotor response in the fly

  • Published:
Kybernetik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Studies of the optomotor response, the tendency to turn in response to a moving pattern, have yielded some understanding of the motion detection capabilities of the fly. We present data from extracellular microelectrode recordings from the optic lobes of the housefly, Musca domestica and the blowflies Eucalliphora lilaea and Calliphora phaenicia. Directionally selective and directionally nonselective motion sensitive units were observed in the region between the medulla and the lobula of all three species. Employing similar stimulus conditions to those used in the optomotor reaction studies, it was found that the response of the directionally selective units exhibited most of the characteristics of the optomotor response torque measurements. It is concluded that these units code the information prerequisite to the optomotor response and hence, that much data processing is achieved in the first few synaptic layers of the insect visual nervous system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, H. B., and W. R. Levick: The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 178, 477–504 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, L. G., and D. G. Keehn: Two types of motion sensitive neurons in the optic lobe of the fly. Nature (Lond.) 212, 1374–1376 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberrg, V.: Personal communication (1966).

  • Burkhardt, D.: Optical properties of the insect eye. Proc. Symp. on Information Processing in Sight Sensory Systems, Calif. Inst. Tech., p. 75–84 (1965).

  • Burtt, E. T., and W. T. Catton: Electrical responses to visual stimulation in the optic lobes of the locust and certain other insects. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 133, 68–88 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermi, G. V., u. W. Reichardt: Optomotorische Reaktionen der Fliege Musca domestica. Kybernetik 2, 15–28 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. G.: Behavioral Analysis of the visual system of the fraitfly Drosophila. Proc. Information Processing in Sight Sensory Systems, California Institute of Technology, p. 85–100 (1965).

  • Green, J. D.: A simple microelectrode for recording from the central nervous system. Nature (Lond.) 182, 962 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartline, H. K., and F. Ratliff: Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J. gen. Physiol. 40, 357–376 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, G. A.: Extracellular recordings from single neurons in the optic lobe and brain of the locust. In: The physiology of the insect central nervous system. London and New York: Academie Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, G. D., and G. F. MacGinitie: Optomotor response studies of insect vision. Proc. roy. Soc. B 163, 369–401 (1965a).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, G. D.: Correlated studies of insect visual nervous systems. Proc. Symp. on Functional Organization of Compound Eyes, Stockholm, Sweden (1965b), in press.

  • Vowles, D. M.: Proc. roy. Loc. B, in press (1965).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, L.G., Keehn, D.G. Neural correlates of the optomotor response in the fly. Kybernetik 3, 288–295 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271512

Keywords

Navigation