Summary
Rules for selection that maximize the expected merit of selected candidates are discussed. When the proportion selected is constant, selection based on conditional means of merit given the observations is optimum in the above sense, regardless of the distribution. This does not hold if the proportion selected is random. When the expected value of the observations is a linear function of a set of unknown parameters, selection can be based on a vector of “corrected” records, w. It is shown that under normality, the conditional mean of merit given w is the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP), provided that the expected value of the merit function is the same in all candidates. A Bayesian argument is given to justify the use of BLUP as a selection rule when the expected merit differs from candidate to candidate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bulmer MG (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bulmer MG (1982) Sire evaluation with best linear unbiased predictors. Biometrics 38:1085–1088
Cochran WG (1951) Improvement by meams of selection. In: Proc 2nd Berkeley Symp Math Stat Prob, pp 449–470
Dempfle L (1977) Relation entre BLUP (Best linear unbiased prediction) et estimateurs bayesiens. Ann Genet Sel Anim 9:27–32
Fernando RL (1984) Selection and assortative mating. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois
Gianola D, Fernando RL (1986) Bayesian methods in animal breeding theory. J Anim Sci 63:217–244
Gianola D, Goffinet B (1982) Sire evaluation with best linear unbiased predictors. Biometrics 38:1085–1088
Goffinet B (1983) Selection on selected records. Genet Sel Evol 15:91–98
Harville DA (1977) Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J Am Stat Assoc 72:320–338
Henderson CR (1963) Selection index and expected genetic advance. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC 982, Washington DC, pp 141–163
Henderson CR (1973) Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In: Proc Anim Breed Genet Symp in Honor of Dr Jay L Lush. Am Soc Anim Sci and Am Dairy Sci Assoc, Champaign Ill, pp 10–41
Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31:423–449
Henderson CR (1977) Prediction of future records. In: Pollak E, Kempthorne O, Bailey TB Jr (eds) Proc Int Conf Quant Genet. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 615–638
Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554
Portnoy S (1982) Maximizing the probability of correctly ordering random variables using linear predictors. J Multivar Anal 12:256–269
Rao CR (1973) Linear statistical inference and its applications. Wiley and Sons, New York
Searle SR (1979) Notes on variance component estimation: a detailed account of maximum likelihood and kindred methodology. Cornell University Ithaca, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by L. D. Van Vleck
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernando, R.L., Gianola, D. Optimal properties of the conditional mean as a selection criterion. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 72, 822–825 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266552
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266552