Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of soil water content by X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Experiments were conducted to compare the use of X-ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods for determining water content in soil. Soil cores of Mexico silt loam packed at bulk densities of 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 Mg/m3 and Crider silty clay packed at bulk densities of 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 Mg/m3 were evaluated using a CT scanner. Results indicate that the X-ray CT explained 98% of the variation in water content over a range from air-dry to saturation. Three attempts were made to obtain MRI scans of soil cores varying in soil water content. Two of these attempts were made with contrasting agents. No images were obtained of the soil cores during all three attempts. It is suggested that the failure to obtain images of soil cores is closely related to the settings of the pulse repetition time and the spin echo time on the MRI unit. The range in settings for these two parameters on the commercial MRI unit used in this study did not allow short increments to be selected and therefore it was not possible to obtain reconstructed images of the soil cores for this experiment. However accessibility to a prototype MRI unit should allow more conclusive work to determine the full capabilities of MRI for determining soil water content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SH, Gantzer CJ, Boone JM, Tully RJ (1988) Rapid nondestructive bulk density and soil water content determination by computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:35

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall PT, Amtey SR, Kasturi SR (1984) NMR data handbook for biomedical applications, chapter 2. Basic physics for NMR and NMR imaging. Pergamon Press, New York, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR (1965) Particle density. Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Agronomy 9:371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley PA, Rogers HH, Foster TH (1986) NMR imaging shows water distribution and transport in plant root systems in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:87

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA, Di Chiro G (1975) Theory of image reconstruction in computed tomography. Radiology 117:561

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA, Di Chiro G (1976) Principles of computer assisted tomography (CAT) in radiographic and radioisotopic imaging. Phys Med Biol 21:689

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JM, Johnson GA, Kramer PJ (1986) In vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of changing water content in Pelargonium hortorum roots. Plant Physiol 82:1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Budinger TF, Gullberg GT (1974) Three dimensional reconstruction in nuclear medicine emission imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 21:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Crestana S, Mascarenhas S, Pozzi-Mucelli RS (1985) Static and dynamic three-dimensional studies of water in soil using computed tomographic scanning. Soil Sci 140:326

    Google Scholar 

  • Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Agronomy 9:545

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth JM, Aylmore LAG (1983) The use of computer-assisted tomography to determine spatial distribution of soil water content. Aust J Soil Res 21:435

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth JM, Aylmore LAG (1986) Water extraction by single plant roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:841

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounsfield GN (1972) A method of and apparatus for examination of a body by radiation such as X- or gamma-radiation. Brit Pat No 1283915, London

  • Jamison VC, Smith DD, Thornton JF (1968) Soil and water research on a claypan soil. USDAARS Tech Bull 1379, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GA, Thompson MB, Gewalt SL, Hayes CE (1986) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging at microscopic resolution. J Magnet Reson 68:129

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WH (1988) Design and implementation of a portable computerized axial tomography system for field use. Nucl Instrum Methods (In press)

  • Omasa K, Onone M, Yamada H (1985) NMR imaging for measuring root systems and soil water content. Environ Control Biol 23:99

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold RF, Matzkanin GA, De Los Santos A (1985) Surface soil water content measurement using pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:537

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic AM, Siebert JE, Rieke PE (1982) Soil bulk density analysis in three dimensions by computed tomographic scanning. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:445

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers HH, Bottomley PA (1987) In situ nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of roots: Influence of soil type, ferromagnetic particle content, and soil water. Agron J 79:957

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart P, Tovey NK (1982) Electron microscopy of soils and sediments: techniques. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 161–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollner EW, Rollwitz WL (1988) Pulse NMR for quantifying moisture in agricultural materials. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng (In press)

  • Tollner EW, Verma BP, Cheshire JM (1987) Observing soil tool interactions and soil organisms using X-ray computer tomography. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 30:1605

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt RC, Alberts EE, Hjelmfelt AT (1986) Variability of runoff and soil loss from fallow experiment plots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:730

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Journal No. 10424, Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, S.H., Gantzer, C.J. Determination of soil water content by X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Irrig Sci 10, 63–71 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266158

Keywords

Navigation