Skip to main content
Log in

Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya

1. Evidence of multivariate differences between the two types

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Both reciprocal averaging and discriminant analysis confirm visual impressions that covered and naked barleys from several areas in the Himalaya differ significantly from each other in a multivariate way. Discriminant analysis also suggests similar differences between the ‘occidental’ and ‘oriental’ barleys of Takahashi (1955). Either distinction has implications for our understanding of barley phylogeny and evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum BR (1983) Morphometric relationships in Hordeum vulgare (Triticeae, Poaceae). 2. Hordeum agriocrithon, H. lagunculiforme, H. spontaneum, and H. vulgare. Can J Bot 61:2023–2031

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum BR, Bailey LG (1983) Morphometric relationships in Hordeum vulgare (Triticeae, Poaceae). 1. H. spontaneum. Can J Bot 61:2015–2022

    Google Scholar 

  • Freisleben R (1940a) Die phylogenetische Bedeutung asiatischer Gersten. Der Züchter 12:257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Freisleben R (1940b) Die Gersten der deutschen Hindukusch-Expedition 1935. Kühn-Archiv 54:295–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1973) Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J Ecol 61:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull CH, Nie NH (1981) SPSS update 7–9: new procedures and facilities for releases 7–9. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PJ (1982) Primitive cereals and their wild relatives. PhD Thesis, University College of North Wales, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PJ, Witcombe JR (1981) Variation in Himalayan barley and the concept of centres of diversity. In: Asher MJC, Ellis RP, Hayter AM, Whitehouse RNH (eds) Barley genetics, vol. IV. Editorial sub-committee, 4th Int Barley Genet Symp, Edinburgh, pp 26–36

  • Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (1975) SPSS, Statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilan R (1964) The cytology and genetics of barley 1951–1962. Washington State University Press, Pullman, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao AR (1974) Genecology of Nepalese cereals. PhD Thesis, University College of North Wales, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi R (1955) The origin and evolution of cultivated barley. Adv Genet 7:227–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi R, Hayashi J, Hiura U, Yasuda S (1968) A study of cultivated barleys from Nepal Himalaya and North India with special reference to their phylogenetic differentiation. Ber Ohara Inst Landwirtsch Biol, Okayama Univ 14:85–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR (1974) University College Bangor Nepal Expedition 1971: Report of the Genetic Conservation Project. University College of North Wales, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR (1975a) Cereals in Nepal. FAO (Rome), Plant Genet Resources Newslett 31:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR (1975b) Bangor Lyallpur Universities Expedition to Northern Pakistan 1974: Genetic Conserv Rep. University College of North Wales, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR (1978) University College Bangor Expedition to Northern India 1976: Genetic Conserv Rep. University College of North Wales, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR, Murphy PJ (1986) Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya. 2. Why do they differ from each other so extensively? Theor Appl Genet 71:736–741

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. Riley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, P.J., Witcombe, J.R. Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 71, 730–735 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263271

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263271

Key words

Navigation