Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on urological prostheses and endoprostheses

  • Urolithiasis
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The combination of ESWL and Endourology (EU) enables a wider range of stones to be treated without open surgery than either modality alone. EU frequently involves the maintenance of a plastic prosthesis in or near the area of maximal shock wave concentration during ESWL. Prostheses subjected to a standard test treatment by ESWL and others removed from patients after ESWL were examined visually, microscopically and biochemically by electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) to investigate the effects of ESWL on the prosthesis itself. Foley catheter balloons leaked. Previously smooth surfaces were disrupted and possibly toxic additives may be released. Care should be taken in selecting indewelling EU prostheses if ESWL treatment is likely to follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alken P, Hardeman S, Wilbert D, Thuroff J, Jacobi G (1985) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL): Alternatives and adjuvant procedures. World J Urol 3:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaussy C (1982) Extracorpreal shockwave lithotripsy. New aspects in the treatment of kidney stone disease. Karger, Basel, pp 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenberger F, Fuchs G, Miller K, Bub P, Rassweiler J (1985) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endourology: an ideal combination for the treatment of kidney stones. World J Urol 3:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denziger D (1985) Dornier Co (Personal communication)

  5. Lamport H, Newman HF (1984) Ultrasonic lithotresis in the ureter. J Urol 76:520–529

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matouschek E (1984) The lithotrity of stones in the ureter under visual control. Eur Urol 10:60–61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramsay JWA, Crocker PR, Hill SR (1984) Calculogenesis on biomaterials. Proc Symp Interactions of cells with biomaterials. Royal College of Surgeons of England. Plenum Press, New York (in press)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruutu M, Alfthan O, Talja M, Andersson LC (1985) Cytotoxicity of latex urinary catheters. Br J Urol 57:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  9. Webb DR, McNicholas TA, Whitfield HN, Wickham JEA (1985) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, endourology and open surgery: the management and follow up of 200 patients with urinary calculi. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:337–430

    Google Scholar 

  10. Webb DR, Fitzpatrick JM (1985) Experimental ureterolithotripsy. World J Urol 3:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wickham JEA, Webb DR, Payne SR, Kellett MJ, Watkinson G, Whitfield HN (1985) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 50 patients treated in Britain. Br Med J 290:1188–1189

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wickham JEA, Miller RA (1983) Percutaneous renal surgery. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London Melbourne New York, pp 94–95

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNicholas, T.A., Ramsay, J.W.A., Crocker, P.R. et al. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on urological prostheses and endoprostheses. Urol. Res. 14, 309–313 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262381

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262381

Key words

Navigation