Skip to main content
Log in

Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neuroendoscopy is rapidly becoming an essential part of the neurosurgeon's repertoire. Currently, very few studies have identified the complications of this new technique, yet many have warned of the steep learning curve associated with its practice. We have reviewed the last 173 neuroendoscopic procedures performed by one surgeon and identified two distinct groups of complications: those that have clinically significant sequelae and those that cause concern intraoperatively but no overt clinical problems. The 173 procedures were performed on 152 patients. Of these patients, 11 suffered significant complications (7%). Twenty-two of the procedures were complicated by intraoperative problems (13%). The incidence of insignificant complications appeared to decrease with experience, whereas that of the significant ones did not. These complications occurred in association with a wide variety of operations over a 2-year period. We conclude that neuroendoscopy is a relatively safe technique with an overall 7% complication rate and a steep learning curve, and that, with a few simple guidelines, it can be employed by all neurosurgeons for the betterment of their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auer LM, Deinsberger W, Niederkorn K (1989) Endoscopic surgery versus medical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a randomized study. J Neurosurg 70:530–535

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fukushima T (1978) Endoscopic biopsy of intraventricle tumors with the use of a ventriculofiberscope. Neurosurgery 2:110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffith HB (1986) Endoneurosurgery: endoscopic intracranial surgery. In: Lymon L (ed) Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, vol 14. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 2–24

    Google Scholar 

  4. Handler MH, Abbott R, Lee M (1994) A near fatal complication of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 35:525–528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch JF (1982) Percutaneous ventriculocisternostomies in noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Monogr Neurol Sci 8:170–178

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman HJ (1976) The advantages of percutaneous third ventriculostomy over other forms of surgical treatment for infantile obstructive hydrocephalus. In: Morley TP (ed) Current controversies in neurosurgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 691–703

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis AL, Crone KR, Taha JM (1994) Surgical resection of third ventricle colloid cysts: preliminary results comparing transcallosal microsurgery with endoscopy. J Neurosurg 81:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manwaring KH (1992) Endoscopeguided placement of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt. In: Manwaring KH, Crone KR (eds) Neuroendoscopy. Liebert, New York, pp 29–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oka K, Yamamoto M, Ikeda K, Tomoraga M (1993) Flexible endoneurosurgical therapy for aqueduct stenosis. Neurosurgery 33:236–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D, Bombois D (1975) Place de la ventriculocisternostomie dans la traitement des hydrocephalies non communicantes. Neurochirurgie 21:557–569

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pierre-Kahn A, Capelle L, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D, Hoppe-Hirsch E, Hirsch JF (1990) Treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts by percutaneous transfrontal ventriculocystostmy. Apropos of 17 cases. Neurochirurgie 36:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pool JL (1938) Myeloscopy: intraspinal endoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 37:1401–1402

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stookey B, Scarff J (1936) Occlusion of the aqueduct of Sylvius by neoplastic and non-neoplastic processes with a rational surgical treatment for relief of the resultant hydrocephalus. Bull Neurol Inst NY 5:348–377

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teo C, Jones RFC, Stening WA, Kwok BCT (1991) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy. In: Matsumoto T (ed) Hydrocephalus: pathogenesis and management. Springer, Tokyo, pp 672–683

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teo C, Pihoker K, Ratcliffe S, Boop FA (1994) Anatomical and physiological considerations of third ventriculostomy (abstract). Child's Nerv Syst 10:481

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vries J (1978) An endoscopic technique for third ventriculostomy. Surg Neurol 9:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  17. Walker ML, Petronio J, Carey CM (1994) Ventriculoscopy. In: Cheek WR (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery: surgery of the developing nervous system. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 572–581

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teo, C., Rahman, S., Boop, F.A. et al. Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery. Child's Nerv Syst 12, 248–253 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261804

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261804

Key words

Navigation