Summary
Generation mean analysis was carried out for ten crosses between two resistant and two susceptible parents to find the genetic basic of resistance to zonate leaf spot disease in forage sorghum. In all crosses except one, at least one type of non-allelic interaction was present. Both additive and dominance gene effects were significant for most crosses. Duplicate type epistasis was present for the inheritance of this disease. Resistance to this disease revealed overdominance. Appropriate breeding plans were suggested to exploit the disease resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cavalli LL (1952) An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In Quantitative Inheritance. HMSO, London, pp 135–144
Grewal RPS, Lodhi GP, Paroda RS (1986) Inheritance studies on zonate leaf spot disease of forage sorghum. Forage Res 12: 73–77
Hayman BI (1958) The separation of epistasis from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 12:371–390
Hayman BI, Mather K (1955) The description of genetic interactions in continous variation. Biometrics 11:69–82
Jinks JL, Jones RM (1958) Estimation of components of heterosis. Genetics 43:223–234
Mather K (1949) Biometerical Genetics, 1st edn. Methuen, London
Rana BS, Anahosur KH, Vasudeva Rao MJ, Jay Mohan Rao V, Paramesh Parameshwarappa R, Rao NGP (1982) Inheritance of field resistance to sorghum downy mildew. Indian J Genet 42:70–74
Scherff RH (1973) Bacterial blight of soybean as influenced by population of yellow bacteria on leaves and buds. Phytopathol 63:752–765
Wheeler AEJ (1969) An introduction to plant disease. Wiley, London, 301
Williams RJ, Frederikasen RA, Girard JC (1978) Sorghum and pearlmillet disease identification handbook. ICRISAT Inf Bull No 1, pp 13, 21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by G.S. Khush
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grewal, R.P.S. Genetic basis of resistance to zonate leaf spot disease in forage sorghum. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 76, 550–554 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260906
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260906