Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of linkage between marker loci and loci affecting quantitative traits in crosses between segregating populations

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

By making use of pedigree information and information on marker-genotypes of the parent and F-1 individuals crossed to form an F-2 population, it is possible to carry out a linkage analysis between marker loci and loci affecting quantitative traits in a cross between segregating parent populations that are at fixation for alternative alleles at the QTL, but share the same alleles at the marker loci. For two-allele systems, depending on marker allele frequencies in the parent populations, 2–4 times as many F-2 offspring will have to be raised and scored for markers and quantitative traits in order to provide power equivalent to that obtained in a cross between fully inbred lines. Major savings in number of F-2 offspring raised can be achieved by scoring each parent pair for a large number of markers in each chromosomal region and scoring F-1 and F-2 offspring only for those markers for which the parents were homozygous for alternative alleles. For multiple allele systems, particularly when dealing with hypervariable loci, only 10%–20% additional F-2 offspring will have to be raised and scored to provide power equivalent to that obtained in a cross between inbred lines. When a resource population contains novel favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci that are not present (or rare) in a commercial population, analyses of this sort will enable the loci of interest to be identified, mapped and manipulated effectively in breeding programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckmann JS, Soller M (1983) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in varietal identification and genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping, and costs. Theor Appl Genet 67:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in plant genetic improvement. In: Miflin BJ (ed) Oxford Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 3:197–250

  • Beckmann JS, Soller M (1987) Molecular markers in genetic improvement of farm animals. Biotechnology 5:573–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann JS, Kashi Y, Hallerman EM, Nave A, Soller M (1986). Restriction fragment length polymorphisms among Israeli Holstein-Friesian dairy bulls. Anim Genet 17:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986) Toward a saturated linkage map of tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112:887–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW (1984a) A method of identifying lines for use in improving parents of a single cross. Crop Sci 24:355–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW (1984b) A method for identifying populations containing favorable alleles not present in elite germplasm. Crop Sci 24:1053–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards MD, Stuber CW, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116:113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Ronald Press, New York, p. 117

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerman EM, Nave A, Kashi Y, Beckmann JS, Soller M (1987) Restriction fragment length polymorphism in dairy and beef cattle at the growth hormone and prolactin loci. Anim Genet 18:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Helentjaris R, Slocum M, Wright S, Schaeffer A, Nienhuis J (1986) Construction of genetic linkage maps in maize and tomato using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 72:761–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1982) Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 79:142–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Jinks JL (1971) Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London, p. 18

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan I, Robertson A (1974) The power of methods for detection of major genes affecting quantitative characters. Heredity 32:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray M, Morrison WI, Whitelaw DD (1982) Host susceptibility to African trypanosomiasis: Trypanotolerance. In: Baker JR, Muller R (eds) Advances in Parasitology, vol. 21. Academic Press, London New York pp 1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Leppert M, O'Connell P, Wolf R, Holm T, Culver M, Martin C, Fujimoto E, Hoff M, Kumlin E, White R (1987) Variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) markers for human gene mapping. Science 235:1616–1622

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis J, Helentjaris T, Slocum M, Ruggero B, Schaefer A (1987) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of loci associated with insect resistance in tomato. Crop Sci 27:797–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Beckmann JS (1983) Genetic polymorphisms in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet 67:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Beckmann JS (1987) Genomic genetics and the utilization for breeding purposes of genetic variation between populations. 2nd Int Cong Quantitative Genetics. Raleigh NC, June 1987

  • Soller M, Plotkin-Hazan J (1977) The use of marker alleles for the introgression of linked quantitative alleles. Theor Appl Genet 51:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Genizi A, Brody T (1976) On the power of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 47:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW, Edwards MD, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci 27:639–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Medina-Filho H, Rick CM (1981). The effect of isozyme selection on metric characters in an interspecific backcross of tomato — basis of an early screening procedure. Theor Appl Genet 60:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Medina-Filho H, Rick CM (1982) Use of naturally-occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Heredity 49:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday JM (1961) Location of polygenes. Nature 191:368–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejos CE, Tanksley SD (1983) Segregation of isozyme markers and cold tolerance in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 66:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller J (1987) Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in Lycopersicon (tomato) with the aid of genetic markers using an approximate maximum likelihood method. Heredity 59:413–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller J, Soller M, Brody T (1988) Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (L. esculentum x L. pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118:329–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuchenko AA, Samovol AP, Karol AB, Andryushchenko VK (1979) Linkage between loci of quantitative characters and marker loci. II. Influence of three tomato chromosomes on variability of five quantitative characters in backcross progenies. Genetika 15:672–683

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by E. J. Eisen

Contribution no. 2124-E, 1987 series from The Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckmann, J.S., Soller, M. Detection of linkage between marker loci and loci affecting quantitative traits in crosses between segregating populations. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 76, 228–236 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257850

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257850

Key words

Navigation