Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of VP16-213 given by different administration methods

  • Articles
  • VP16-213 Pharmacokinetics
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Plasma pharmacokinetics of VP16-213 were investigated after a 30–60 min infusion in 14 adult patients and six children. In adults the elimination half-life (T1/2 β), plasma clearance (Clp) and volume of distribution (Vd) were respectively 7.05±0.67 h, 26.8±2.4 ml/min/m2, and 15.7±1.8 l/m2; in children 3.37±0.5 h, 39.34±6.6 ml/min/m2, and 9.97±3.7 l/m2. After repeated daily doses no accumulation of VP16-213 was found in plasma. The unchanged drug found in the 24 h urine after administration amounted to 20–30% of the dose.

In eight choriocarcinoma patients plasma levels of VP16-213 were measured after oral capsules and drinkable ampoules. The bioavailability compared to the i.v. route was variable, mean values being 57% for capsules and 91% for ampoules. In one further patient, with abnormal d-Xylose absorption results, VP16-213 was not detectable in plasma after the oral ampoule dose.

Steady state levels investigated in three patients after 72 h continuous VP16-213 infusion (100 mg/m2/24 h) were around 2–5 μg/ml. Levels of VP16-213 were undetectable in CSF after i.v. or oral administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen LM (1980) Analysis of 4′-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6-0-ethylidene-βd-glucopyranoside) by high-pressure liquid chromatography. J Pharm Sci 69:1440

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen LM, Creaven PJ (1975) Comparison of the human pharmacokinetics of VM26 and VP16, two antineoplastic epipodophyllotoxin glucopyranoside derivatives. Eur J Cancer 11:697

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold AM (1979) Podophyllotoxin derivative VP16-213. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 3:71

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brunner KW, Sonntag RW, Ryssel HJ, Cavalli F (1976) Comparison of the biologic activity of VP16-213 given iv and orally in capsules or drink ampules. Cancer Treat Rep 60:1377

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cavalli F, Sonntag RW, Jungi F, Senn HJ, Brunner KW (1978) VP16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: A randomized trial using three dosage schedules. Cancer Treat Rep 62:473

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo T, Broggini M, Torti L, Erba E, D'Incalci M (1981) Pharmacokinetics of VP16 in Lewis lung carcinoma bearing mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (in press)

  7. Creaven PJ, Allen LM (1975) EPEG, a new antineoplastic epipodophyllotoxin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 18:221

    Google Scholar 

  8. D'Incalci M, Erba E, Vaghi M, Morasea L (1982) In vitro cytotoxicity of VP16-213 on primary tumor and metastasis of levis lung carcinoma. Eur J Cancer (in press)

  9. Evans WE, Sinkule JA, Horvath A, Crom WR, Dow LW, Rivera G (1981) Clinical pharmacology of VM26 (NSC 122819) and VP16 (NSC 1415-0) in children with cancer. Proc Am Ass Cancer Res 22:174

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farina P, Marzillo G, D'Incalci M (1981) High-performance liquid chromatography determination of 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6-0-ehylideneβ-d-glucopyranoside (VP16-213) in human plasma. J Chromatogr 222:141

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holthuis JJM, Pinedo HM, Van Oort WJ (1981) A sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of the antineoplastic agents VP16-213 and VM26 in biological fluids. Anal Chim Acta 130:23

    Google Scholar 

  12. Issell BF, Crooke ST (1979) Etoposide (VP16-213). Cancer Treat Rev 6:107

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newlands ES, Ragshawe KD (1980) Anti-tumor activity of the epipodophyllin derivative VP16-213 (etoposide: NSC 141540) in gestational choriocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 16:401

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pinkerton CR, Glasgow JFT, Bridges JM, Welshman SG (1981) Enterotoxic effect of methotrexate: Does it influence the drug's absorption in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? Br Med J 282:1276

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rivera G, Avery T, Pratt C (1975) 4′-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-0-2-thenylidene-β-d-glucopyranoside) (NSC-122819; VM26) and 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-0-ethylidene-β-d-glucopyranoside) (NSC-141540; VP16-213) in childhood cancer: Preliminary observations. Cancer Chemother Rep 59:743

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rozencweig M, Von Hoff DD, Henney JE, Muggià FM (1977) VM26 and VP16-213: A comparative analysis. Cancer 40:334

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snodgrass W, Walker L, Heideman R, Odom LF, Hays T, Tubergen DG (1980) Kinetics of VP16 epipodophyllotoxin in children with cancer. Proc Am Ass Cancer Res 21:333

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stähelin H (1973) Activity of a new glycosidic lignan derivative (VP16-213) related to podophyllotoxin in experimental tumors. Eur J Cancer 9:215

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strife RJ, Jardine I, Colvin M (1980) Analysis of the anticancer drugs VP16-213 and VM26 and their metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 182:211

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strife RJ, Jardine I, Colvin M (1981) Analysis of the anticancer drugs etoposide (VP16-213) and teniposide (VM26) by highperformance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr 224:168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D'Incalci, M., Farina, P., Sessa, C. et al. Pharmacokinetics of VP16-213 given by different administration methods. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 7, 141–145 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254536

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254536

Keywords

Navigation