Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of three severity score indexes in an evaluation of serious bacterial pneumonia

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two non specific severity scoring systems, acute physiological score (APS) and simplified acute physiological score (SAPS) are compared with a specific index (Sc) in an evaluation of 96 ICU patients with “serious” bacterial pneumonia. The three scores were measured during the first 24 h following ICU admission. There is a good correlation between APS, SAPS or Sc. Accuracy and efficiency of the non specific scoring indexes and Sc are similar. There is no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, receiver operating characteristic curves of the three indexes. Simple and reliable non specific index such as SAPS, valid for a variety of pathologies, can be used in an evaluation of mortality and comparative studies of groups of patients with serious bacterial pneumonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE (1981) Apache: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9:591

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Gall JR, Loirat Ph, Alperovitch A (1983) Simplified acute physiological score for intensive care patients. Lancet 2:741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Durocher A, Beuscart C, Fourrier F, Beuscart R, Dubois D, Steenhouver F, Chopin C, Gosselin B, Wattel F (1982) Facteurs pronostiques des pneumopathies bactériennes. In: Etats infectieux graves en réanimation. Expansion Scientifique (ed), Paris, pp 49–54

  4. Harley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Gall JR, Loirat Ph, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Mathieu D, Mercier P, Thomas R, Villers D (1984) A simplfied acute physiologic score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 12:175

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le Gall JR, Loirat Ph, Nicolas F, Granthil C, Wattel F, Thomas R, Glaser P, Mercier P, Latournerie J, Candau P, Macquin I, Alperovitch A, Bigel P (1983) Utilisation d'un indice de gravité dans huit services de réanimation multidisciplinaires. Nouv Presse Med 12:1757

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loirat Ph, Gyaraud M, Rigattieri S, Alperovitch A, Legall JR (1983) Comparison of three severity indexes in acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Intensive Care Med 9:236

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moreau R, Sicot C (1985) Evaluation du pronostic à court terme des cirrhoses admises en réanimation à l'aide de 4 indices de gravité. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 9:871

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Knaus WA, Le Gall JR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Loirat P, Campos RA, Cullen DJ, Kholes MK, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mercier P, Nicolas F, Nikki P, Shin B, Snyder JV, Wattel F, Zimmerman JE (1982) Comparison of intensive care in the USA and France. Lancet 2:642

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durocher, A., Saulnier, F., Beuscart, R. et al. A comparison of three severity score indexes in an evaluation of serious bacterial pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 14, 39–43 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254120

Key words

Navigation