Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of a new whole body scanner with a large crystal scanning camera in whole body imaging

  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical parameters and the clinical experience obtained in one year with a new whole body scanning system are presented. Advantages and disadvantages of this system are described in comparison with a large crystal scanning camera. The whole body scanner has two detectors each an array of ten crystals with a large area (700 cm2 per head) able to scan a surface of 60x193 cm. The information is formed in a 160 by 512 point matrix and stored on a floppy disc. X-ray or polaroid film output is available. Whole body bone scans (both A.P. and P.A.) with excellent resolution are obtained in less than 25 min.

The relative sensitivity and resolution of both imaging systems was studied using line and plane source phantoms and clinical material. Taking into account the different physical parameters of the systems an attempt at a practical comparison of scans is made in terms of time, sensitivity, resolution and image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ell, P.J., Myers, M.J. A comparison of a new whole body scanner with a large crystal scanning camera in whole body imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 2, 281–284 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252579

Keywords

Navigation