Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the sensitivity of PET and NMR for in vivo quantitative metabolic imaging

  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with compounds labelled with positron-emitting radionuclides like 11C, 13N and 15O, it is possible to study metabolism in vivo in a non-invasive way. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging takes advantage of the spin of protons in water molecules to measure both their number and relaxation times in vivo, but is, in principle, not limited to protons and can also be used for other nuclei with a non-zero spin, e.g. 13C and 31P. The use of 13C opens the possibility of studying the metabolism of a large number of compounds. In order to choose the appropriate methodology for metabolic imaging, i.e. PET or NMR, it is important to know the sensitivity of each modality. The present study outlines the sensitivity of both techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger G, Maziere M, Prenant C, Sastre J, Comar D (1984) 11C Labelling of a protein: Concanavalin A. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 35:81–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F, Hansen WW, Packard M (1946) Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 69:127

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolster JM, Vaalburg W, van Veen W, van Dijk T, van der Molen HD, Wynberg H, Woldring MG (1983) Synthesis of no-carrier-added L- and D-[1-11C]-Dopa. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 34:1650–1652

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley PA, Andrew ER (1978) RF magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in biological tissue: Implications for NMR imaging. Phys Med Biol 23:630–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Budinger TF, Gullberg GT, Huesman RH (1979) Emission computed tomography. In: Herman GT (ed) Image reconstructions from projections. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 147–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Damadian R (1971) Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance. Science 171:1151–1153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadian DG (1982) Nuclear magnetic resonance and its application to living systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf J, Venema K (1983) Amino acids in substantia nigra of rats with striatal lesions produced by kainic acid. J Neurochem 40:1171–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterbur PC (1973) Image formation by induced local interactions: Examples employing NMR. Nature 242:190–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell EM, Torrey HC, Pound HV (1946) Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev 69:37–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AP (1981) Synthesis of organic compounds labeled, with positron emitters and the carrier problem. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm 18:1–2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paans, A.M.J., Vaalburg, W. & Woldring, M.G. A comparison of the sensitivity of PET and NMR for in vivo quantitative metabolic imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 11, 73–75 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252137

Key words

Navigation