Abstract
This study examines variations in the basic parameter of the gravity model: the distance or travel time exponent. In a conceptual examination of the exponent under ideal conditions, it is noted that the exponent will be low if either production or consumption of the phenomena is geographically concentrated. It is further noted that if all regions produce and consume the phenomena, this generally implies a large number of substitute regions, and therefore a large exponent. These three variables are made operational and related to a set of eighty exponents for 1967 commodity flows in the United States. A multiple regression model is derived and utilized to estimate the exponents. The latter are then used to reestimate the flows. The root mean squared errors are quite similar for the fitted and estimated exponents. Implications of the research appear to be consistent with variations of the exponent in the urban context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcaly, R. E. (1967). “Aggregation and Gravity Models: Some Empirical Evidence”. Journal of Regional Science(7), pp. 61–73.
Ashford, N. and Covault, D. O. (1969). “The Mathematical Form of Travel Time Factors”. Highway Research Record. (283). pp. 30–47.
Bellomo, S. J., Dial, R. B. and Voorhees, A. M. (1970). Factors, Trends and Guidelines Related to Trip Length. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Highway Research Board (Report No. 89).
Black, W. R. (1971). “The Utility of the Gravity Model and Estimates of its Parameters in Commodity Flow Studies”. Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers. (3), pp. 28–32.
Black, W. R. (1972). “Interregional Commodity Flows: Some Experiments with the Gravity Model.” Journal of Regional Science (12) (in press).
Bureau of Public Roads (1965). Calibrating and Testing a Gravity Model for any Size Urban Area. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hanson, M. E. (1966). Project Metran: An Integrated Transportation System for Urban Areas. (M.I.T. Report No. 8). Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Heanue, K. E. and Pyers, C. F. (1966). “A Comparative Evaluation of Trip Distribution Procedures. Highway Research Record (114), pp. 20–50.
Huff, D. L. (1962). Determination of Intra-Urban Retail Trade Areas. Los Angeles: Real Estate Research Program, Univ. of California.
Keefer, L. E. and Witheford, D. K. (1969). Urban Travel Patterns for Hospitals, Universities, Office Buildings and Capitols. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Highway Research Board (Report No. 62).
Martin, B., Memmott, F. and Bone, A. (1961). Principles and Techniques of Predicting Future Demand for Urban Area Travel. (M.I.T. Report No. 3). Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Niedercorn, J. H. and Bechnolt, B. V. (1969). “An Economic Derivation of the Gravity Model”. Journal of Regional Science (9), pp. 273–282.
Olsson, G. (1965). Distance and Human Interaction. (Bibliography No. 2). Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.
Pyers, C. F. and Bouchard, R. J. (1965). “The Use of the Gravity Model for Forecasting Urban Travel: An Analysis and Critique”. Highway Research Record (88), pp. 1–43.
Smith, R. H. T. (1970). “Concepts and Methods in Commodity Flow Analysis”. Economic Geography, (46), pp. 404–416.
Whitmore, R. E. (1965). Graphical and Mathematical Investigation of the Differences in Travel Time Factors for the Gravity Model Trip Distribution Formula for Several Specific Urban Areas. Department of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, unpublished.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Black, W.R. An analysis of gravity model distance exponents. Transportation 2, 299–312 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243358
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243358