Skip to main content
Log in

Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Scalp potential fields in human subjects were evoked by checkerboard reversals to the upper and lower hermiretinae, using 1.6 and 3.2 reversals/s. Averaged fields were sampled along a saggital midline row of electrodes (field profiles) in 20 subjects, and from a 47 electrode array (field maps) in five subjects. In five subjects, profile peaks and troughs between 84 and 128 ms latency resided within the recorded electrode row surrounded by lesser potential values, and thus met the evaluation criteria. Response latency defined as maximal voltage difference between two electrodes within the profiles was significantly shorter (medians 12 and 11 ms, respectively) for upper than for lower hemiretina stimuli at both frequencies. There was a significant difference between latencies to 3.2 and 1.6 stimuli/s in the upper but not in the lower hemiretina system, suggesting different system behavior of the two retinal halves. Pertinent anatomical, electrophysiological, and behavioral data are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, P.O., Kozak, W., Vakkur, G.J.: Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: Axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 163, 466–502 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eason, R.G., White, C.T., Oden, D.: Averaged occipital responses to stimulation of sites in the upper and lower halves of the retina. Percept. Psychophys. 2, 423–425 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B.: Figurai after-effects: displacement or contrast. Am. J. Psychol. 77, 607–613 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S., Kries, J. von: Über die Abhängigkeit der Reaktionszeit vom Ort des Reizes. Arch. Anat. Physiol. (Leipzig) Suppl. 1–10 (1879)

  • Halliday, A.M., Michael, W.F.: Changes in pattern-evoked potentials in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 208, 499–513 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, D.A., Axford, J.G.: Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin. Exp. Brain Res. 16, 22–40 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D., Dawson, W.W.: The histology of retinas from the pinnipedia. Vision Res. 10, 691–702 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, E., Hummelsheim, E.: Die Untersuchung der Funktionen des excentrischen Netzhautgebietes. In: Graefe-Saemisch Handbuch der gesamten Augenheilkunde. T. Saemisch (Ed.), Vol. 4, S. 503–583. Leipzig: Engelmann 1904

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D.: Multichannel topography of human alpha EEG fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 31, 439–449 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D., Meles, H.P., Mir, Z.: Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemiretina: latency differences. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 43, 725–731 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D., Mir, Z.: Methodik und Auswertung visuell evozierter EEG-Potentiale bei Verdacht auf multiple Sklerose. J. Neurol. 213, 97–103 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesèvre, N.: Potentiels évoqués par des pattern chez l'homme: influence des variables caractérisant le stimulus et sa position dans le champ visuel. In: A. Fessard and G. Lelord (Eds.), Activités évoquées et leur conditionnement. INSERM, Paris, 1–22 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, F.N.: The peripheral visual acuity of 100 subjects Am. J. Physiol. 140, 83–88 (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, W.F., Halliday, A.M.: Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern evoked responses in man. Brain Res. 32, 311–324 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Millodot, M., Lamont, A.: Peripheral visual acuity in the vertical plane. Vision Res. 14, 1497–1498 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Østerberg, G.: Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthal (Kbh.)., Suppl. 6, 1–102 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, W.H.: Visual reaction times on a circle about the fovea. Science 155, 481–482 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S.: Nonparametric statistics, pp. 312. New York: Me Graw-Hill 1956

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation; EMDO Foundation, Zürich; Hartmann-Müller-Stiftung, Zürich; Smith-Kettlewell Institute, San Francisco, California; and Stiftung Wiss. Forschung, Zürich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, D., Skrandies, W. Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems. Exp Brain Res 35, 151–159 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236791

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236791

Key words

Navigation