Skip to main content
Log in

Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the dark

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper compares the motion sensations of a subject rotated about a vertical axis for two fixed visual fields (a large peripheral field and a single central spot) and in darkness.

Motion sensation is described in terms of threshold, frequency response, and subjective displacement and velocity.

The perception of angular acceleration showed significantly lower threshold and reduced latency time for the illuminated presentation. The level of illumination, however, produced no significant difference in threshold. The subjective frequency response, measured by a nulling method, showed a higher gain in the illuminated presentation, particularly at low frequencies and accelerations. With the subject rotating a pointer to maintain a fixed heading during triangular velocity stimuli, subjective displacements showed no difference for all different visual cues. Magnitude estimates of the after-rotation associated with deceleration from a constant velocity showed a quicker rising speed, larger subjective velocity and longer duration in the illuminated presentation. All the results suggest that the oculogyral illusion is principally responsible for producing a lower threshold in the illuminated presentation, although the fixed peripheral visual field tends to reduce reliance upon vestibular signals. At lower intensity rotation stimuli, this effect is especially apparent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borkenhagen JM (1974) Rotary acceleration of a subject inhibits choice-reaction time to motion in peripheral vision. J Exp Psychol 102: 484–487

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark B (1967) Thresholds for the perception of angular acceleration in man. Aerosp Med 38: 443–450

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark B, Stewart JD (1962) Perception of angular acceleration about the yaw axis of a flight simulator. Aerosp Med 33: 1426–1432

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark B, Stewart JD (1968) Comparison of sensitivity for the perception of bodily rotation and the oculogyral illusion. Percept Psychophys 3: 253–256

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark B, Stewart JD (1972) Comparison of the sensitivity to rotation of pilots and non-pilots. Aerosp Med 43: 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark B, Stewart JD (1974) Choice reaction time to visual motion with varied levels of simultaneous rotary motion. Am J Psychol 87: 441–448

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark B, Stewart JD (1974) Effects of angular acceleration on man. Choice reaction time using visual and rotary motion information. Percept Mot Skills 38: 735–743

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon WT (1973) BMD-biomedical computer programs. University of California Press, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doty RL (1969) Effects of duration of stimulus presentation on the angular acceleration threshold. J Exp Psychol 80: 317–321

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graybiel A, Hupp DI (1946) The oculogyral illusion. J Aviat Med 17: 3–27

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groen JJ, Jongkees LBW (1946) The threshold of angular acceleration perception. J Physiol (Lond) 107: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guedry FE (1974) Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Kornhuber HH (ed) Vestibular system, Part 2: Psychophysics, Applied aspects and general interpretation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–154

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guedry FE, Owens GG, Norman JW (1969) Assessment of semicircular canal function. I. Measurement of subjective effects produced by triangular waveforms of angular velocity. National Aerospace Medical Institute, Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guedry FE, Stockwell CW, Norman JW, Owens GG (1971) Use of triangular waveforms of angular velocity in the study of vestibular function. Acta Otolaryngol [Stockh] 71: 439–448

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guedry FE, Richmond G (1957) Differences in response latency with different magnitude angular acceleration. Report 301, Psychol Dept. US Army Med Res Lab., Fort Worth, KY

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gundry AJ (1977) Thresholds to roll motion in a flight simulator. J Aircr 14: 624–631

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henn VS, Young LR, Finley C (1974) Vestibular units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual scenes. Brain Res 71: 144–149

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marshall JE (1967) Visual-vestibular interaction and threshold for angular acceleration. Report 704, Exp Psychol Division, US Army Med Res Lab., Fort Knox, KY

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meiry JL (1965) The vestibular system and human dynamic space orientation. Sc.D. Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Melvill Jones G, Barry W, Kowalsky N (1964) Dynamics of the semicircular canals compared in yaw, pitch and roll. Aerosp Med 35: 984–989

    Google Scholar 

  21. Melvill Jones G, Young LR (1978) Subjective detection of vertical acceleration. A velocity dependent response? Acta Otolaryngol [Stockh] 85: 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ormsby CC (1974) Model of human dynamic orientation. Ph. D. Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Owens GG, Guedry FE (1969) Assessment of semicircular canal function. II. Individual differences in subjective angular displacement produced by triangular waveforms of angular velocity. Naval Aerospace Medical Institute, Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parsons RD (1970) Magnitude estimates of the oculogyral illusion during and following angular acceleration. J Exp Psychol 84: 230–238

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peters RA (1969) Dynamics of the vestibular system and their relation to motion perception, spatial disorientation and illusions. NASA, CR-1309, System Technology Inc., Hawthorne, CA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stewart JD, Clark B (1975) Choice reaction time to visual motion during prolonged rotary motion in airline pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med 46: 767–771

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van Egmond AAJ, Groen JJ, Jongkees LBW (1949) The mechanics of the semicircular canal. J Physiol (Lond) 110: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  28. Waespe W, Waespe B, Henn V (1978) Vestibular neuron activity and subjective sensation during conflicting vestibular-visual stimulation in monkey and man. Pfluegers Arch [Suppl R87] 373

  29. Waespe W, Henn V (1978) Conflicting visual-vestibular stimulation and vestibular nucleus activity in alert monkeys. Exp Brain Res 33: 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young LR, Oman CM (1969) Model for vestibular adaptation to horizontal rotation. Aerosp Med 40: 1076–1080

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zacharias GL, Young LR (1981) Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation. Exp Brain Res 41: 159–171

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zacharias GL (1977) Motion sensation dependence on visual and vestibular cues. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zacharias GL (1977) Motion cues for pilot-vehicle analysis. Bolt Beranek, Newman, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NASA Ames Research Grants NSG 2012 and 2230

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, J., Young, L.R. Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the dark. Exp Brain Res 41, 172–183 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236606

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236606

Key words

Navigation