Skip to main content
Log in

Bank loan-loss provisions and the income-smoothing hypothesis: An empirical analysis, 1976–1984

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article tests an income-smoothing hypothesis for a sample of 106 large bank holding companies for the period 1976 to 1984. Our focus is on the behavior of the provision for loan losses as a function of bank income and alternative measures of business conditions likely to affect loan portfolio risk-taking or quality. Using an econometric model with pooled time-series, cross-sectional data, we find evidence of income-smoothing behavior over our test period. Our dummy-variable models indicate that regional banking companies tend to engage in income smoothing more than money-center banks. Alternative motivations for income-smoothing behavior, which include bank regulatory policy, risk management, agency theory, and compensation policy, are explored and their policy implications considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, Edward I., et al. Application of Classification Techniques in Business, Banking and Finance. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Audits of Banks. New York, NY: AICPA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asquith, Paul and Mullins, David. “Equity Issues and Offering Dilution.” Journal of Financial Economics (January/February, 1986), 61–90.

  • Ball, R. and Watts, R. “Some Time-Series Properties of Accounting Income.” Journal of Finance (June 1972), 663–681.

  • Barefield, R.M. and Comiskey, E.E. “The Smoothing Hypothesis: An Alternative Test.” The Accounting Review (April 1972), 291–298.

  • Buynak, Thomas M. “How Will Tax Reform Affect Commercial Banks?” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Quarter 2, 1987), 24–34.

  • Comptroller of the Currency, Comptroller's Handbook of Examination Procedures. Comptroller of the Currency, Administrator of National Banks, 1976.

  • Copeland, R. M. “Income Smoothing.” Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies, 1968, 101–116.

  • Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “Recent Trends in Commercial Bank Profitability: A Staff Study.” September 1986.

  • Grammatikos, Theoharry and Saunders, Anthony. “Additions to Bank Loan-Loss Reserves: Good News or Bad News.” First draft, New York University, January 1988.

  • Goldberger, Arthur S. Econometric Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, M. B. and Warren, C. S. “Accounting for Estimated Loan Losses—A Descriptive Study.” Working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1987.

  • Healy, Paul M. “The Effects of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (1985), 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Y. “The Taxation of Banks: Particular Privileges or Objectionable Burdens.” New England Economic Review (May/June 1987), 3–18.

  • Judge, George, et al. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, second edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeton, William R. and Morris, Charles S. “Why Do Banks' Loan Losses Differ?” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, (May 1987), 3–21.

  • Lambert, R. A. “Income Smoothing as Rational Equilibrium Behavior.” The Accounting Review (October 1984), 604–618.

  • Lawrence, E. C. “Forecasting Small Bank Loan Losses.” Bankers Magazine (November–December 1981), 65–68.

  • Moses, O. Douglas. “Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Tests Using Accounting Changes.” Accounting Review (April 1987), 358–377.

  • Musumeci, James J. and Sinkey, Joseph F., Jr. “The International Debt Crisis and Bank Security Returns Surrounding Citicorp's Loan-Loss Decision of May 19, 1987.” Proceedings of the Conference of Bank Structure and Competition (May 1988), forthcoming.

  • Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. Principles and Presentation: Banking. 1971.

  • Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. Principles and Presentation: Banking. 1976.

  • Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. Principles and Presentation: Banking. 1977.

  • Ronen, J. and Sadan, S. Smoothing Income Numbers. Addison-Wesley, 1981.

  • Ronen, J. and Sadan, S. “Classificatory Smoothing: Alternative Income Models.” Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1975), 133–149.

  • Scheiner, J. H. “Income Smoothing: An Analysis in the Banking Industry.” Journal of Bank Research (Summer 1981), 119–123.

  • Sinkey, Joseph F.Jr. Commercial Bank Financial Management in the Financial-Services Industry, third edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkey, Joseph F.Jr. Problem and Failed Institutions in the Commercial Banking Industry. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: 1978.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Handbook of Cyclical Indicators. 1984.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenawalt, M.B., Sinkey, J.F. Bank loan-loss provisions and the income-smoothing hypothesis: An empirical analysis, 1976–1984. J Finan Serv Res 1, 301–318 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235201

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235201

Keywords

Navigation