Summary
Peripheral regions of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields were investigated in cerveau isolé cats using automatically presented moving stimuli. By presenting appropriate stimulus configurations it was shown that the excitatory response to peripherally moving objects (the periphery effect) is not due to an extension of receptive field surround properties into the periphery. The differential effects of solid and striped stimuli indicated that the effectiveness of an object in eliciting the periphery effect is related to the amount of moving edge which it presents. Arguments are presented that the periphery effect results from interactions between spatially separated receptive field organizations. Certain difficulties which these findings raise with respect to the current definition of receptive field are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian, E.D., and R. Matthews: The action of light on the eye. Part III. The interaction of retinal neurones. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 65, 273–298 (1928).
Bishop, P.O., W. Kozak, W.U. Levick and G.J. Vakkur: The determination of the projection of the visual field on to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 163, 503–539 (1962).
Bremer, F.: Cerveau isolé et physiologie du sommeil. C.R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 118, 1235–1242 (1935).
Gallego, A.: Connexions transversales au niveau des couches plexiformes de la rétine. In: Actualités neurophysiol., pp. 5–27, ed. A.M. Monnier. Paris: Masson et Cie 1965.
Hubel, D.H., and T.N. Wiesel: Integrative action in the cat's lateral geniculate body. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 155, 385–398 (1961).
—: Receptive fields and functional architecture in two non-striate visual areas (18 and 19) in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 229–289 (1965).
Kuffler, S.W.: Neurons in the retina: organization, inhibition and excitation problems. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 17, 281–292 (1952).
—: Discharge patterns and functional organization of the mammalian retina. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37–68 (1953).
Levick, W.R., C.W. Oyster and D.L. Davis: Evidence that McIlwain's periphery effect is not a stray light artifact. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 555–559 (1965).
McIlwain, J.T.: Receptive fields of optic tract axons and lateral geniculate cells: peripheral extent and barbiturate sensitivity. J. Neurophysiol. 27, 1154–1173 (1964).
Stone, J.: A quantitative analysis of the distribution of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. J. comp. Neurol. 124, 337–352 (1965).
Wiesel, T.: Receptive fields of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 153, 583–594 (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McIlwain, J.T. Some evidence concerning the physiological basis of the periphery effect in the cat's retina. Exp Brain Res 1, 265–271 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234346
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234346