Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through electroporation of protoplasts

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protoplasts isolated from embryogenic suspension cultures of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hartog) were electroporated in the presence of plasmid pEmuGN and/or pEmuPAT, which contained the reporter gene gus and selectable marker gene bar, respectively. Under optimised electroporation conditions, up to 0.9% of viable protoplasts displayed gus activity two days after electroporation. To select for phosphinothricin (PPT) resistant colonies, electroporated protoplasts were incubated for six weeks in a medium containing 10 μg/ml PPT. The cells surviving the selection were maintained as individual colonies on solid medium or as suspension cultures. More than 60% of these colonies exhibited tolerance to 40 μg/ml PPT when tested 10 months after initial selection. To date, 57 green plants have been regenerated from these colonies and 24 have been transferred to soil. Southern blot analyses of colonies and plants, using the bar gene sequence as the probe, confirmed transformation of the cells. Positive PAT assays of both regenerated colonies and plants indicated the presence of the bar gene product. These results provide a basis for the establishment of routine procedures for transformation of wheat by direct gene transfer into protoplasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

gus:

β-glucuronidase

PAT:

phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase

PPT:

phosphinothricin

MS:

Murashige and Skoog medium

References

  • Ahmed KZ, Sagi F (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker D, Brettschneider R, Lörz H (1994) Plant J. 5: 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DA, Brettell RIS, Last DI, Witrzens B, McEnroy D, Dolferus R, Dennis ES (1994) Aust J Plant Physiol 21: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBlock M, Brouwer DD, Tenning P (1989) Plant Physiol 91: 694–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Focus 12: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha SB, Wu FS, Thorne TK (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 601–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann RM, Ozias-Akins P, Vasil V, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Vasil IK, Fraley RT (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • He DG, Yang YM, Scott KJ (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn ME, Shillito RD, Conger BV, Harms CT (1988) Plant Cell Rep 7: 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 387–405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Taylor BH, Gersmann M, Brettell RIS (1990) Aust J Physiol. 17: 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee BT, Murdoch K, Topping J, De Both MTJ, Wu QS, Karp A, Steele S, Symonds C, Kreis M, Jones MGK (1988) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 12: 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee BT, Murdoch K, Topping J, Kreis M, Jones MGK (1990) In “Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry” (ed). Bajaj YPS Vol 13. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lörz H, Baker B, Shell J (1985) Mol Gener Genet 199: 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsan PA, Lupotto E, Locateli F, Qiao YM, Cattaneo M (1993) Plant Sci 93: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehra NS, Chibbar RN, Leung N, Caswell K, Mallard C, Steinhauer L, Baga M, Kartha KK (1994) Plant J 5: 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oard JH, Paige D, Dvorak J (1989) Plant Cell Rep 8: 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou-Lee TM, Turgeon R, Wu R (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6815–6819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng JY, Lyznik LA, Lee L, Hodges TK (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9: 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I (1991) Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes CA, Pierce DA, Mettler IJ, Mascarenhas D, Detmer J (1988) Science 240: 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott KJ, He DG, Karunaratne S, Mouradov A, Mouradova E, Yang YM (1994). Approaches to genetic engineering of cereals. In: Improvement of cereal quality by genetic engineering of cereals, (eds. Henry R & Ronalds JA) Plenum.

  • Shimamoto K, Terada R, Izawa T, Fujimoto H (1989) Nature 338: 274–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Castrillo AM, Fromm ME, Vasil IK (1992) Bio/Tech 10: 667–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Castrillo AM, Fromm ME, Vasil K (1993) Bio/Tech 11: 1553–1558

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks JT, Anderson OD, Blechl AE (1993) Plant Physiol 102: 1077–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang YM, He DG, Scott KJ (1991) Aust J Plant Physiol 18: 445–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang YM, He DG, Scott KJ (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13: 176–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang YM (1994) Suspension and protoplast culture of wheat. MSc Thesis, The University of Queensland.

  • Zaghmout OM-F, Wang WC (1992) Anal Biochem 204: 239–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaghmout OM-F, Trolinder NL (1993) Theor Appl Genet 86: 721–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Stiff CM, Konzak CF (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 612–616.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. Lörz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, D.G., Mouradov, A., Yang, Y.M. et al. Transformation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through electroporation of protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports 14, 192–196 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233789

Key words

Navigation