Skip to main content
Log in

Sentence types and the form-function fit

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Akmajian, A., S. Steele, and T. Wasow: 1979, ‘The Category AUX in Universal Grammar,’ Linguistic Inquiry 10, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. and R. M. Harnish: 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, S.: [This reference was left unspecified. Adrian was Probably referring to ‘The Syntax of English Imperatives,’ 1977, unpublished Paper, University of Texas, Austin. SS.]

  • Steele, S. et al.: 1981, An Encyclopedia of AUX: a Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 5, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

[This footnote was left empty. Common practice suggests that it would have contained acknowledgements. SS]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akmajian, A. Sentence types and the form-function fit. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 2, 1–23 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233711

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233711

Keywords

Navigation