Summary
To explore the effectiveness of insect derived protease inhibitors in protecting plants against insect feeding, anti-trypsin, anti-chymotrypsin and anti-elastase protease inhibitor (PI) genes from Manduca sexta L. were expressed in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). From 198 independent transformants, 35 elite lines were further analyzed. Under the control of the 35S promoter of CaMV, PI accumulated to approximately 0.1% of total protein, depending on the tissue analyzed. Using cell-flow cytometry, DNA content/ nuclei of transgenic and non-transformed cotton were identical. On cotton plants expressing PIs, fecundity of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.), the sweetpotato whitefly, was reduced compared to controls. Expression of these protease inhibitors may reduce the developmental rate of B. tabaci and other insects, and provide a strategy for cotton protection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayley C, Trolinder NL, Ray C, Morgan M, Quisenberry JE, Ow DW (1992) Engineering 2,4-D resistance into cotton. Theor Appl Genet 83: 645–649
Benfey PN, Ren L, Chua N-H (1990) Tissue-specific expression from CaMV 35S enhancer subdomains in early stages of plant development. EMBO J. 9: 1677–1684
Bevan M (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 8711–8721
Broadway RM, Duffey SS (1986a) Plant protease inhibitors: mechanism of action and effect on the growth and digestive physiology of larvae Heliothis zea and Spodoptera exiqua. J Insect Physiol 32: 827–833
Broadway RM, Duffey SS, Pearce G, Ryan CA (1986b) Plant protease inhibitors: a defense against herbivorous insects? Ent Exp Appl 41: 33–38
Brown JK, Bird J (1992) Whitefly transmitted geminiviruses in the Americas and the Caribbean Basin: past and present. Plant Disease 76: 220–225
Burgess EPJ, Stevens PS, Keen GK, Laing WA, Christeller JT (1991) Effects of protease inhibitors and dietary protein level on the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus. Entomol Exp Appl 621: 123–130
Cushman JC, Meyer G, Michalowski CB, Schmitt JM, Bohnert HJ (1989) Salt stress leads to differential expression of two isogenes of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase during Crassulacean acid metabolism induction in the common ice plant. Plant Cell 1: 715–725
Firoozabady E, DeBoer DL, Merlo DJ, Halk EL, Amerson LN, Rashka KE, Murray EE (1987) Transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 10: 105–116
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983). Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049–1051
Gatehouse AMR, Gatehouse JA, Boulter D (1980) Isolation and characterization of trypsin inhibitors from cowpea. Phytochemistry 19: 751–756
Ghosh S, Gepstein S, Heikkila JJ, Dumbroff EB (1988) Use of a scanning densitometer or an ELISA plate reader for measurement of nanogram amounts of protein in crude extracts from biological tissues. Analytical Biochemistry 169: 227–233
Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense against insects. Science 175: 776–777
Guerineau F, Woolston S, Brooks L, Mullineaux P (1988) An expression cassette for targeting foreign proteins into chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Research 16: 11380.
Hemsley A, Arnheim N, Toney MD, Cortopassi G, Galas DJ (1989) A simple method for site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 6545–6551
Hilder VA, Gatehouse AMR, Sheerman SE, Barker RF, Boulter D (1987) A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobacco. Nature 330: 160–163
Johnson R, Narvaéz J, An G, Ryan CA (1989) Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proc Nat Acad Sciences 86: 9871–9875
Kanost MR, Sarvamangala VP, Wells MA (1989) Primary structure of a member of the serpin superfamily of proteinase inhibitors from an insect Manduca sexta. J Biol Chem 264: 965–972
MacIntosh SC, Kishore GM, Perlak FJ, Marrone PG, Stone TB, Sims SR, Fuchs RL (1990) Potentiation of Bacillus thuringensis insecticidal activity by serine protease inhibitors. J Agric Food Chem 38: 1145–1152
Narvaéz-Vásquez J, Orozco-Cárdenas MI, Ryan CA (1992) Differential expression of a chimeric CaMV-tomato proteinase inhibitor I gene in leaves of transformed nightshade, tobacco and alfalfa plants. Plant Mol Biol 20: 1149–1157
Perlak, F.J., Deaton, R.W., Armstrong, T.A., Fuchs, R.L., Sims, S.R., Greenplate, J.T. and Fischoff, D.A. 1990. Insect resistant cotton. Bio/Technology 8: 939–943
Ryan CA (1973) Proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 24: 173–196
Ryan CA (1990) Protease inhibitors in plants: genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopath 28: 425–449
Schaffer HJ, Cushman JC (1994) Characterization of promoter elements required for the salt inducible expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Physiol 105: 128
Schwartz RH (1983) Cotton insect management with special reference to boll weevil. In: Agric Handbook 589 USDA, Ridgway RL, Lloyd FP, Cross WH (eds)
Thomas JC, Wasmann CC, Echt C, Robert L, Dunn RL, Bohnert HJ, McCoy TJ (1995) Introduction and expression of an insect proteinase inhibitor in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports (in press)
Umbeck P, Johnson G, Barton K, Swain W (1987) Genetically transformed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Bio/Technology 5: 263–266
Williamson, J.D., Hirsch-Wyncott, M.E., Larkins, B.A. and Gelvin, S.B. 1989. Differential accumulation of a transcript driven by the CaMV 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 90: 1570–1576.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. J. Finer
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, J.C., Adams, D.G., Keppenne, V.D. et al. Protease inhibitors of Manduca sexta expressed in transgenic cotton. Plant Cell Reports 14, 758–762 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232917
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232917