Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulatory effect of water stress on plant regeneration in aromatic Indica rice varieties

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frequency of regeneration of fertile plants from cell suspensions was significantly increased using water stress treatments in two commercially cultivated Indian aromatic rice varieties, Basmati 385 and Pusa Basmati 1. The water stress treatments included the use of 1.0% (w/v) agarose instead of 0.5% (w/v) for medium solidification, inclusion of mannitol (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 M) in regeneration medium, or 24 h partial desiccation of calli. When the agarose concentration of the regeneration medium was increased from 0.5% to 1.0% (w/v), the frequency of shoot formation in Pusa Basmati 1 from cell suspension-derived calli increased by over eightfold, to 86%. Mannitol, at 0.1 to 0.2 M concentration, stimulated the frequency of shoot regeneration in Pusa Basmati 1 by fivefold but had no effect in Basmati 385. Mannitol at 0.4 M concentration completely inhibited shoot regeneration but promoted embryogenesis. These calli regenerated shoots with greater frequencies when transferred to mannitol-free medium. Partial desiccation of rice calli resulted in an up to threefold increase in the shoot regeneration frequency. Best regeneration frequencies (54–98%) were obtained when 24 hdesiccated calli were grown on regeneration medium with 1.0% (w/v) agarose. A similar stimulatory effect of water stress on plant regeneration was observed in another Indica rice variety, IR43, and a Japonica rice variety, Taipei 309.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

NAA:

α-napthaleneacetic acid

References

  • Abdullah R, Cocking EC, Thompson JA (1986) Bio/Technol 4: 1087–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe T, Futsuhara Y (1984) Japan J Breed 34: 147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony P, Davey MR, Power JB, Washington C, Lowe KC (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13: 251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Brooks FJ, Pearson D, Mathias RJ (1989) J Plant Physiol 133: 727–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DCW, Leung DWN, Thorpe TA (1979) Physiol Plant 46: 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DCW, Thorpe TA (1980) Physiol Plant 49: 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury CN, Tyagi AK, Maheshwari N, Maheshwari SC (1993) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 32: 357–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta SK, Datta K, Potrykus I (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9: 253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta K, Potrykus I, Datta SK (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Utra Vaz FB, Slamet IH, Khatun A, Cocking EC, Power JB (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 416–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh Biswas GC, Zapata FJ (1993) J Plant Physiol 141: 470–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaszmann JC (1987) Theor Appl Genet 74: 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammatt N, Davey MR (1987) J Plant Physiol 128: 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain RK, Khehra GS, Lee S-H, Blackhall NW, Merchant R, Davey MR, Power JB, Cocking EC, Gosal SS (1995) Plant Cell Rep 14: 515–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor PBK, Reddy GM (1986) J Plant Physiol 126: 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyozuka J, Otoo E, Shimamoto K (1988) Theor Appl Genet 76: 887–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai K-L, Liu L-F (1988) Japan J Crop Sci 57: 553–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Physiol Plant 18: 100–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu CY, Vasil V, Vasil IK (1983) Theor Appl Genet 66: 285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Maretzki A, Thom M, Nickell LG (1974) In: Street HE (eds) Tissue Culture and Plant Science, Academic Press, New York, pp 329–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohira K, Ojima K, Fujiwara A (1973) Plant Cell Physiol 14: 1113–1121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa K, Komamine A (1989) Theor Appl Genet 77: 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Hodges TK (1989) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 25: 91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G, Smith R (1991) Plant Cell Rep 10: 35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranceé IM, Tian W, Mathews H, de Kochko A, Beachy RN, Fauquet C (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13: 647–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryschka S, Ryschka U, Schulze J (1991) Biochem Physiol Pflanzen 187: 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Terada R, Shimamoto K (1993) J Plant Res 3: 201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukahara M, Hirosawa T (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 550–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK (1988) Bio/ Technol 6: 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell DF (1984) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 3: 221–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by I. K. Vasil

On leave from Department of Genetic, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, R.K., Jain, S. & Wu, R. Stimulatory effect of water stress on plant regeneration in aromatic Indica rice varieties. Plant Cell Reports 15, 449–454 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232074

Key Words

Navigation