Skip to main content
Log in

Clonal propagation of Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.) by organogenesis

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clonal propagation of Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.) was achieved by organogenesis on cotyledon explants. The influence of several cytokinins and abscisic acid on adventitious shoot production from cotyledon explants was investigated. Benzyladenine was more effective in shoot induction than three other cytokinins tested. Benzyladenine (22.2 μM) in combination with naphthaleneacetic acid(0.05 μM) in a Gresshoff and Doy (1972) medium was found to increase shoot bud production. Abscisic acid (7.6 μM) in combination with benzyladenine and naphthaleneacetic acid enhanced shoot formation by an additional 65%. Root initiation was achieved with 0.5 strength Gresshoff and Doy media amended with naphthaleneacetic acid (1.3 μM), indole-3-butyric acid (1.2 μM) and benzyladenine (0.4 μM). Over 2400 plantlets from 2 families survived and were transferred to a greenhouse in preparation for field planting. After ten months, the maximum number of surviving plantlets/seed explant from these two sources was 57 for family ALPV-38 and 41 for family ALPV-78, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABA:

Abscisic acid

BA:

N6-Benzyladenine

GD:

Gresshoff and Doy (1972) nutrient media

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric acid

KN:

Kinetin

NAA:

α-Naphthaleneacetic acid

2iP:

2-isopentenyl adenine

ZN:

Zeatin

References

  • Abou-Mandour A, Hartung W (1986) J Plant Physiol 122:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerson RC (1984) J Exp Bot 35:403–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken J, Horgan KJ, Thorpe TA (1981) Can J For Res 11(1):112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Becwar MR, Noland TL, Wann SR (1987) Tappi J 70:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornman CH, Jansson E (1980) Z Pflanzenphysiol 96:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray EA, Beachy RN (1985) Plant Physiol 79:746–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CL, Sommer HE (1977) Tappi J 60:72–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching TM, Parker MC (1958) For Sci 4:128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch ML, Tenbarge K, Simon A, Finkelstein R, Scofield L (1985) In: Doting L, Groot GSP, Hall TC (eds) Molecular Form and Function in the Plant Genome. Plenum Press, New York, pp 555–566

    Google Scholar 

  • David A (1982) In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry. Martinus Nijhoff/ Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Boston, pp 72–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong F, Smith JD, Koehler DE (1983) Plant Physiol 73:895–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Galau GA, Hughes DW, Dure L (1986) Plant Mol Biol 7:155–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladfelter HJ, Phillips GC (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6:163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresshoff PM, Doy CH (1972) Planta 107:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero PM, Mullet JE (1986) Plant Physiol 80:588–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1986) Biotech 4:643–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1987) Biotech 5:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SM, Newton RJ, Soltes EJ (1988) Curr Sci 57:677–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul K (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Konar RN, Singh MH (1980) Z Pflanzenphysiol 99:173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley CR (1989) Tex For News 67:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeand SE, Allen HL (1984) Physiol Plant 61:523–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra-Palta A, Smeltzer RH, Mott RL (1978) Tappi J 61:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott RL, Amerson HV (1981) N Car Res Tech Bull #271 14 pp

  • Neuman PR, Fong F, Newton RJ, Sen S (1988) In Vitro Cell Devel Biol 24(11):51A

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton RJ, Funkhouser EA, Fong F, Tauer CG (1990) For Ecol Mngmt (In Press)

  • Patel KR, Thorpe TA (1984) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 3:131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel KR, Thorpe TA (1986) Tree Physiol 1:289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly K, Washer J (1977) N Z For Sci 7:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Sederoff R, Stomp A-M, Gwynn B, Ford E, Loopstra C, Hodgskiss P, Chilton WS (1987) In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 314–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Fong F, Newton RJ (1987) Plant Physiol 83(S):75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Newton RJ, Fong F, Neuman P (1989) Plant Cell Rep 8:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer RH, White LM (1982) Tissue culture method for asexual propagation of pine trees and medium for use therewith. U S Patent 4, 354,327

  • Sommer HE, Brown CL, Kormanik PP (1975) Bot Gaz 136:196–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb KJ, Street HE (1977) Acta Hortic 78:259–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JD, Quatrano RS, Cuming AC (1985) Eur J Bioch 152:501–507

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. C. Phillips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, S., Sen, S., McKinley, C.R. et al. Clonal propagation of Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.) by organogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 10, 131–134 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232043

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232043

Key Words

Navigation