Skip to main content
Log in

Morphogenetic potential and in vitro micropropagation of endangered plant species Leucojum aestivum L. and Lilium rhodopaeum Delip.

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present work deals with the in vitro methods for rapid propagation, and morphogenetic potential of the rare and endangered bulb species Leucojum aestivum L., Amaryllidaceae, and Lilium rhodopaeum Delip., Liliaceae. The morphogenetic potential of different plant organs (bulb, stem, leaves and ovaries) was studied. Leaves of Leucojum aestivum L. and basal parts of the bulb in Lilium rhodopaeum Delip. possess the highest regeneration activity. Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium + 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) + 1 mg/l kinetin and Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) medium + 0.5 mg/l 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) + 0.1 mg/l kinetin were favourable for direct organogenisis from these explants. A stimulating effect of alow gamma-irradiation dose (5 Gy) upon the quantity and growth intensity of the bulbs formed by the explants in in vitro conditions is observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanasov A (1988) Biotechnology in Plant Growth, Zemizdat, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj YPS (1986) Cereal Res. Commun. 14, 3:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Binding H, Krumbiegel-Schroeren G (1984)In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Butenko RGM (1986) Plant Cell Culture and Biotechnology. Nauka, Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi IYE, Kurtz SL (1990) In: Ammirato PV et al. (eds) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture. Ornamental species. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 126–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon KW, Bum K, Meney KA, Mollins MT (1991) In Vitro 3:27

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay MF (1991) In Vitro 3:27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G (1982) In: Fujiwara A (ed) Plant Tissue Culture. Marzuzen, Tokyo, pp 677–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Konchak I (1987) Dissertation, VSSI Plovdiv

  • Linsmaier E, Skoog F (1965) Physiol. Plantarum. 18:100

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskov I, Savova I, Boshnjakova P, Staneva K, Stoeva A, Atanasov A (1980) Physiologija na Rastenijata 6:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plantarum. 15:473–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickolov C, Daskalov S (1966) Cytological Technique. BAN, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Mensual S, Tognon E (1988) G. Bot. Italy 122:133

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov U, Cherkasov O (1984) Selskohos. Biologia 4:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Qui W (1990) In: Chen Z et al. (eds) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Perennial Crops. McGrow-Hill, New York, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimbaev IR, Nurmahambetova GH (1991) Physiol. i Biochimija Rasvitija Rast. 3:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DF (1984) HortScience 19:725

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. Lörz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanilova, M.I., Ilcheva, V.P. & Zagorska, N.A. Morphogenetic potential and in vitro micropropagation of endangered plant species Leucojum aestivum L. and Lilium rhodopaeum Delip.. Plant Cell Reports 13, 451–453 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231965

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231965

Key words

Navigation