Skip to main content
Log in

Induction and ionic basis of slow wave potentials in seedlings of Pisum sativum L.

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slow wave potentials (SWPs) are transient depolarizations which propagate substantial distances from their point of origin. They were induced in the epidermal cells of pea epicotyls by injurious methods such as root excision and heat treatment, as well as by externally applied, defined steps in xylem pressure (Px)at in the absence of wounding. The common principle of induction was a rapid increase in Px. Such a stimulus appeared under natural conditions after (i) bending of the epicotyl, (ii) wounding of the epidermis, (iii) rewatering of dehydrated roots, and (iv) embolism. The induced depolarization was not associated with a change in cell input resistance. This result and the ineffectiveness of ion channel blockers point to H+-pumps rather than ion channels as the ionic basis of the SWP. Stimuli such as excision, heat treatment and pressure steps, which generate SWPs, caused a transient increase in the fluorescence intensity of epicotyls loaded with the pH-indicator DM-NERF, a 2′, 7′-dimethyl derivative of rhodol, but not of those loaded with the pH indicator 2′,7′-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF). Matching kinetics of depolarization and pH response identify a transient inactivation of proton pumps in the plasma membrane as the causal mechanism of the SWP. Feeding pump inhibitors to the cut surface of excised epicotyls failed to chemically simulate a SWP; cyanide, azide and 2,4-dinitrophenol caused sustained, local depolarizations which did not propagate. Of all tested substances, only sodium cholate caused a transient and propagating depolarization whose arrival in the growing region of the epicotyl coincided with a transient growth rate reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AP:

action potential

BCECF:

2′,7′-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein

DM-NERF 2′,7′:

dimethyl derivative of rhodol

GR:

growth rate

Px :

xylem pressure

Rin :

cell input resistance

SWP:

slow wave potential

Vm :

membrane potential

Vs :

surface potential

References

  • Alarcon J-J, Malone M (1994) Substantial hydraulic signals are triggered by leaf-biting insects in tomato. J Exp Bot 45: 953–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Boari F, Malone M (1993) Rapid and systemic hydraulic signals are induced by localized wounding in a wide range of species. J Exp Bot 44: 741–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman JM, Pickard BG (1977) Depolarization of cell membranes in leaves of Lycopersicon by extract containing Ricca's factor. Can J Bot 55: 511–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove DJ (1981) Rapid suppression of growth by blue light. Occurrence, time course, and general characteristics. Plant Physiol 67: 584–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies E, Zawadzki T, Witters D (1991) Electrical activity and signal transmission in plants: How do plants know? In: Penel C, Grepin H (eds) Plant signalling, plasma membrane and change of state. Université de Geneve, pp 119–137

  • Felle H (1988) Short-term pH regulation in plants. Physiol Plant 74: 583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradmann D (1976) “Metabolic” action potentials in Acetabularia. J Membr Biol 29: 23–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugland RP (1992) Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals. Molecular Probes, Eugene USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodick D, Sievers A (1988) The action potential of Dionea muscipula Ellis. Planta 174: 8–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Houwinck AL (1935) The conduction of excitation in Mimosa pudica. Rec Trav Bot Neerl 32: 51–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien JL, Desbiez MO, de Jaeger G, Frachisse JM (1991) Characteristics of the wave of depolarization induced by wounding in Bidens pilosa L. J Exp Bot 42: 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano K (1955) Electrical change caused by blazing in a nonsensitive plant. Bot Mag 68: 337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourie JI (1994) Transient Cl and K currents during the action potential in Chara inflata. Effects of external sorbitol, cations, and ion channel blockers. Plant Physiol 106: 651–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurkdijan M, Guern J (1989) Intracellular pH: measurement and importance in cell activity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 40: 271–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone M (1992) Kinetic of wound-induced hydraulic signals and variation potentials in wheat seedlings. Planta 187: 505–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone M (1996) Rapid, long-distance signal transmission in higher plants. Adv Bot Res 22: 163–228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone M, Stankovic B (1991) Surface potentials and hydraulic signals in wheat leaves following localized wounding by heat. Plant Cell Environ 14: 431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyen C, Johannes E (1996) Systemin transiently depolarizes the tomato mesophyll cell membrane and antagonizes fusicoccininduced extracellular acidification of mesophyll tissue. Plant Cell Environ 19: 464–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold L, Seiden A, Volokita M (1984) Is modulation of the rate of proton pumping a key event in osmoregulation? Plant Physiol 75: 846–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricca U (1916) Soluzione d'un problema di fisiologia. La propagazione di stimulo nella Mimosa. Nuovo Giorn Bot Ital 23: 51–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblin G, Bonnemain J-L (1985) Propagation in Vicia faba stem of a potential variation by wounding. Plant Cell Physiol 26: 1273–1283

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein B (1977) Osmotic shock inhibits auxin-stimulated acidification and growth. Plant Physiol 59: 369–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein B (1982) Regulation of H excretion. Plant Physiol 69: 939–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildknecht H (1978) Über die Chemie der Sinnpflanze Mimosa pudica L. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildknecht H (1984) Turgorins -new chemical messengers for plant behaviour. Endeavor 8: 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanjers AW (1981) Bioelectric potential changes in the style of Lilium longiflorum Thunb. after self- and cross-pollination of the stigma. Planta 153: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1992) Rapid alterations in growth rate and electrical potentials upon stem excision in pea seedlings. Planta 187: 523–531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1994) Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. I. Shortdistance effects are due to wounding. Plant Cell Environ 17: 1143–1151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1995) Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. II. Longdistance effects are due to hydraulic signals. Plant Cell Environ 18: 33–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tester M (1990) Plant ion channels: whole-cell and single-channel studies. New Phytol 114: 305–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Thain JF, Grubb IR, Wildon DC (1995) Depolarization of tomato leaf cells by oligogalacturonide elicitors. Plant Cell Environ 18: 2111–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaplev YB, Zatsepina GN (1980) Electrical nature of the propagation of a variation potential in Tradescantia. Biofizika 25: 723–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Umrath K (1959) Der Erregungsvorgang. In: Ruhland W (eds) Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie 17, 24–110, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sambeek JW, Pickard BG, Ulbright W (1976) Mediation of rapid elelctrical, metabolic, transpirational and photosynthetic changes by factors released from wounds. Mediation of the variation potential by Ricca's factor. Can J Bot 54: 2651–2661

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne R (1994) The excitability of plant cells: with a special enphasis on Characean internode cells. Bot Rev 60: 265–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendler S, Zimmermann U, Bentrup, FW (1983) Relationship between cell turgor pressure, electrical membrane potential, and chloride efflux in Acetabularia mediterranea. J Membr Biol 72: 75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildon DC, Doherty HM, Eagles G, Bowles DJ, Thain JF (1989) Systemic responses arising from localized heat stimuli in tomato plants. Ann Bot 64: 691–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildon DC, Thain JF, Minchin PEH, Gubb IR, Reilly AJ, Skipper YD, Doherty HM, O'Donnell PJ, Bowles DJ (1992) Electrical signalling and systemic proteinase inhibitor induction in the wounded plant. Nature 360: 62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann U, Beckers F (1978) Generation of action potentials in Chara corallina by turgor pressure changes. Planta 138: 173–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants to D.J.C. from the U.S. Department of Energy. We wish to thank R. Cyr, S. Gilroy, J. Lynch, R. Snyder and the Root biology group of the Pennsylvania State University for help and permission to use their equipment, R.E. Cleland and E. Van Volkenburgh for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stahlberg, R., Cosgrove, D.J. Induction and ionic basis of slow wave potentials in seedlings of Pisum sativum L.. Planta 200, 416–425 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231397

Key words

Navigation