Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial interactions in the rhesus monkey retina: a behavioural study using the Westheimer paradigm

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For two trained rhesus monkeys, increment thresholds for a small test-spot of 100 ms duration were determined as a function of background size, at 10 retinal eccentricities along the horizontal meridian. Typical ‘Westheimer-functions’ were obtained, i.e. threshold first increases with increasing background size, reaches a maximum, then decreases with further increasing backgrounds and finally reaches a plateau. With increasing retinal eccentricities, the position of the peak of the functions is shifted towards larger background sizes, indicating an increase of perceptive field centre size from 0.25° at 5° eccentricity to 1.5° at 40° eccentricity. The perceptive field centres tend to be slightly smaller in the nasal retina. Total perceptive field sizes, as indicated by the beginnings of the plateaus, increase from about 1° near the fovea to about 3° at 40° eccentricity. The perceptive field centre sizes of two human observers, tested under the same experimental conditions, closely resemble those of the monkeys. The total perceptive fields are larger in the human subjects. The retinal ganglion cells determining threshold in this experiment are most likely the broad-band cells. The agreement between the behaviourally determined perceptive field centre sizes and the receptive field centre sizes of broadband cells (measured by DeMonasterio and Gouras 1975) is excellent. The dendritic fields of P-α-ganglion cells, most likely the morphological substrates of the broad-band cells (Perry, Oehler and Cowey 1984) are somewhat smaller at all eccentricities. The close agreement between monkey and human psychophysical data and between monkey psychophysical and neurophysiological data indicates that the Westheimer paradigm actually provides a tool to study behaviourally the receptive field organization of the human retina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach M, Bouis D, Fischer B (1983) An accurate and linear infrared oculometer. J Neurosci Methods 9: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow HB (1972) Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1: 371–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland BG, Dubin MW, Levick WR (1971) Simultaneous recording of input and output of lateral geniculate neurons. Nat New Biol 231: 191–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford BH (1940) The effect of field size and pattern on the change of visual sensitivity with time. Proc R Soc (Lond) B 129: 94–106

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMonasterio FM, Gouras P (1975) Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina. J Physiol (Lond) 251: 167–195

    Google Scholar 

  • DeValois RL, Morgan HC (1974a) Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. II. Squirrel monkey wavelength and saturation discrimination. Vision Res 14: 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • DeValois RL, Morgan HC (1974b) Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. III. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers. Vision Res 14: 75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • DeValois RL, Morgan HC, Polson MC, Mead WR, Hull EM (1974) Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. I. Macaque luminosity and color vision tests. Vision Res 14: 53–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch JM (1978) Quantitative layer-by-layer perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 17: 208–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch JM, Berger R, Birn R (1970) A static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties: responses near visual field lesions with sharp borders. Doc Ophthalmol 29: 154–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch JM, Sunga RN, Bachmann E (1970) Static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties. I. Extension of Westheimer's experiment on spatial interaction. Am J Ophthalmol 70: 113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentini A, Bayle EH, Maffei L (1972) Peripheral and central contributions to psychophysical spatial interactions. Vision Res 12: 253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammon RW, Scobey RP (1982) The luminance and response range of monkey retinal ganglion cells to white light. Vision Res 22: 271–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwerth RS (1982) Glenn Fry Award lecture: behavioral studies of amblyopia in monkeys. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59: 535–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks TP, Lee BB, Vidyasagar TR (1983) Responses of cells in macaque lateral geniculate nucleus to sinusoidal gratings. J Physiol (Lond) 337: 183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung R, Spillmannn L (1970) Receptive-field estimation and perceptual integration in human vision. In: Young FA, Lindsley DB (eds) Early experience and visual information processing in perceptual and reading disorders. Nat Acad Sci, Washington DC, pp 181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan E, Shapley RM (1982) X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. J Physiol (Lond) 330: 125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee BB, Virsu V, Creutzfeldt O (1983) Linear signal transmission from prepotentials to cells in the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus. Exp Brain Res 52: 50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennie P, Derrington A (1981) Spatial contrast sensitivity in the macaque's LGN. ARVO (Abstract)

  • MacLeod DIA (1978) Visual sensitivity. Ann Rev Psychol 29: 613–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff JI, Sturr JF (1971) Spatial and luminance determants of the increment threshold under monoptic and dichoptic viewing. J Opt Soc Am 61: 1530–1537

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehler R (1982) Perzeptive Feldmessungen beim Rhesusaffen. Ein Verhaltensexperiment mit dem Westheimer Paradigma. Dissertation, Freiburg i.Br.

  • Oehler R, Spillmann L, Fischer B (1982) Visual perceptive fields of the rhesus monkey. Pflügers Arch 392 (Suppl): R 49 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl L, Wässle H (1979) Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centers in the cat retina. J Physiol (Lond) 291: 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl L, Wässle H (1983) The structural correlate of the receptive field centre of alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Physiol (Lond) 341: 309–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry VH, Oehler R, Cowey A (1984) Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience 10: 1101–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Fischer B (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity of striate and prestriate cortical neurons of the behaving rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 40: 1392–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom-Hogg A, Spillmann L (1980) Perceptive field size in fovea and periphery of the light- and dark-adapted retina. Vision Res 20: 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodieck RW, Stone J (1965) Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 28: 833–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET, Cowey A (1970) Topography of the retina and striate cortex and its relationship to visual acuity in rhesus monkeys and squirrel monkeys. Exp Brain Res 10: 298–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller PH, Colby CL (1983) The response of single cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rhesus monkey to color and luminance contrast. Vision Res 23: 1631–1641

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobey RP (1981) Movement sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells in monkey. Vision Res 21: 181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley RM, Kaplan E, Soodak RM (1981) Spatial summation and contrast sensitivity of X and Y cells in the LGN of the macaque. Nature 292: 543–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Lanson RN (1961) A technique for measuring the latency of a discriminative operant. J Exp Anal Behav 4: 149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturr JF, Teller DY (1973) Sensitization by annular surrounds: dichoptic properties. Vision Res 13: 909–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunga RN, Enoch JM (1970) A static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties. III. Clinical trials. Am J Ophthalmol 70: 244–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller D (1980) Locus questions in visual science. In: Harris CS (ed) Visual coding and adaptability. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp 151–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller DY, Andrews DP, Barlow HB (1967) Local adaptation in stabilized vision. Vision Res 6: 701–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JP (1970) Model of the function of receptive fields in human vision. Psychol Rev 77: 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G (1965) Spatial interaction in the human retina during scotopic vision. J Physiol (Lond) 181: 881–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G (1967) Spatial interaction in human cone vision. J Physiol (Lond) 190: 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz H (1969) Visual receptive fields of striate cortex neurons in awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 32: 727–742

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oehler, R. Spatial interactions in the rhesus monkey retina: a behavioural study using the Westheimer paradigm. Exp Brain Res 59, 217–225 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230900

Key words

Navigation