Skip to main content
Log in

Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have investigated how the control of hand transport and of hand aperture are coordinated in prehensile movements by delivering mechanical perturbations to the hand transport component and looking for coordinated adjustments in hand aperture. An electric actuator attached to the subject's right arm randomly pulled the subject backwards, away from the target, or pushed them towards it, during a quarter of the experimental trials. A compensatory adjustment of hand aperture followed the immediate, mechanical effects of the perturbation of hand transport. The adjustment appeared to return the subject towards a stereotyped spatial relation between hand aperture and hand transport. These spatial patterns suggest how the two components may be coordinated during prehension. A simple model of this coordination, based on coupled position feedback systems, is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Hunter IW (1992) Time-varying stiffness of human elbow-joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 88: 433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Accornero N, Chapple W, Hogan N (1984) Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement. J Neurosci4: 2738–2744

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95: 49–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ERFW, Goodeve TJ (1983) Feedback control of hand movement and Fills' Law. Q J Exp Psychol 35A: 251–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky MR (1985) Robotic grasping and fine manipulation. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fel'dman AG (1966a) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. II. Controllable parameters of the muscles. Biophysics 11: 565–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Fel'dman AG (1966b) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. III. Mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks. Biophysics 11: 667–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T (1987) The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements. Biol Cybern 57: 257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradii ML, Scarpa M, Umiltà C, Rizzolatti G (1991) Neuropsychologia 29: 361–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P (1994) Perturbation studies of human prehension. In: Bennett KMB, Castiello U (eds) New insights into the reach to grasp movement. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 151–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1990) Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking devices. J Mot Behav 22: 315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1991) Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension. Neurosci Lett 122: 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff B, Arbib MA (1993) Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. J Mot Behav 25: 175–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4: 2745–2754

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Archibald YM, Carey DP, Goodale MA (1991) A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia 29: 803–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In: Long J, Baddeley AD (eds) Attention and performance, IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J. pp 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movement. J Mot Behav 26: 235–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83: 502–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R (1991b) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res87: 407–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polit A, Bizzi E (1979) Characteristics of the motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 42: 183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers CT, Goodall RN, Pratt DJ (1986) Control and instrumentation systems in the enhancement of postural stability. Progress Reports on Electronics in Medicine and Biology for 1986. Institute of Electronic and Radio Engineers, pp 131–38

  • Saltzman E, Kelso JAS (1987) Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. Psychol Rev 94: 84–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18: 245–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haggard, P., Wing, A. Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension. Exp Brain Res 102, 483–494 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230652

Key words

Navigation