Skip to main content
Log in

Adapting to monocular vision: grasping with one eye

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether normal subjects with one eye covered and patients in whom one eye had been enucleated generate more head movements than subjects using binocular vision during the performance of a visually guided grasping movement. In experiment 1, 14 right-handed normal subjects were tested binocularly and monocularly in a task in which they were required to reach out and grasp oblong blocks of different sizes at different distances. Although the typical binocular advantage in reaching and grasping was observed, the overall head movement scores did not differ between these testing conditions. In experiment 2, seven right-handed enucleated patients were compared to seven age and sex-matched control subjects (tested under binocular and monocular viewing conditions), on the same task as used in experiment 1. While no differences were found in the kinematics of reaches produced by the enucleated patients and the control subjects, the patients did produce larger and faster resultant head movements, composed mainly of lateral and vertical movements. This suggests that enucleated patients may be generating more head movements in order to better utilize retinal motion cues to aid in manual prehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allara RD, Linberg JV, Tillman W, Odom JV (1986) Visual function in monocular patients following enucleation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:106

    Google Scholar 

  • Biguer B, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1982) The coordination of eye, head, and arm movements during reaching at a single visual target. Exp Brain Res 46:301–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Biguer B, Prablanc C, Jeannerod M (1984) The contribution of coordinated eye and head movements in hand pointing accuracy. Exp Brain Res 55:462–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS (1978) Peering — a locust behaviour pattern for obtaining motion parallax information. J Exp Biol 76:237–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees JW (1966) Accuracy of absolute visual distance and size estimation in space as a function of stereopsis and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol 72:466–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellard CG, Goodale MA, Timney B (1984) Distance estimation in the Mongolian gerbil: the role of dynamic depth cues. Behav Brain Res 14:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellard CG, Goodale MA, Scorfield DM, Lawrence C (1986) Visual cortical lesions abolish the use of motion parallax in the Mongolian gerbil. Exp Brain Res 64:599–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris SH (1972) Motion parallax and absolute distance. J Exp Psychol 95:258–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez EG, Steinbach MJ, Ono H, Wolf ME (1989) Depth perception in children enucleated at an early age. Clin Vision Sci 4:173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Ellard CG, Booth L (1989) The role of image size and retinal motion in the computation of absolute distance by the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Vision Res 30:399–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappin JS (1991) Perceiving environmental structure from optical motion. In: Johnson WW, Kaiser MK (eds) Visually guided control of movement. NASA Conference Publications, Moffett, CA, pp 39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg CR, Lambert S (1990) Distance estimation in the Hooded rat: experimental evidence for the role of motion cues. Behav Brain Res 41:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Marotta JJ, Perrot TS, Nicolle D, Goodale MA (in press) The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation. Eye 9:3

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers B, Graham M (1979) Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception 8:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JT (1932) Depth discrimination in the rat. J Genet Psychol 40:136–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz TL, Linberg JV, Tillman W, Odom JV (1987) Monocular depth and vernier acuities: a comparison of binocular and uniocular subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:304

    Google Scholar 

  • Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32:1513–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson WA (1993) Optic flow and depth perception. Spat Vis 7:35–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach MJ, Ono H, Wolf ME (1991) Motion parallax judgements of both as a function of the direction and type of head movement. Can J Psychol 45:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace GK (1959) Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria forskal. J Exp Biol 36:512–525

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marotta, J.J., Perrot, T.S., Nicolle, D. et al. Adapting to monocular vision: grasping with one eye. Exp Brain Res 104, 107–114 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229860

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229860

Key words

Navigation