Abstract
The emphasis currently placed on citizen participation in planning results in part from the recognition that planning requires judgments that have both value and technical components. This article describes a case study of a citizen participation process in which planners' judgments, rather than the judgments of the members of a citizens' task force, seemed to dictate the outcome. Although citizens were supposed to be influential in the policy analysis, they were, in effect, excluded from a meaningful role in the process. The analysis was actually guided by planners' supposedly technical judgments. Those judgments had important value implications, however, and those implications were not made clear to the citizens' task force. Examples are given of judgments made by planners at each stage of the analysis and the value components of those judgments are discussed. In each example, the judgments resulted in elimination of alternatives, selection of information, or integration of information. Two examples of methods of citizen participation which can increase the influence of citizens' judgments are also described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, N. E. and Primack, J. R. (1980). “The public and technological decisions,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, June, 44-48.
Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969). “A ladder of citizen participation,” Journal of The American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224.
Aron, Joan B. (1979). “Citizen participation at government expense,” Public Administration Review 39: 477–485.
Branch, Melville (1978). “Critical unresolved problems of urban planning analysis,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 44: 47–59.
Coe, Barbara A. (1982). “The Denver air quality plan: A policy planning process.” Report to the Environmental and Societal Impacts Group, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.
Cupps, Stephen D. (1977). “Emerging problems of citizen participation,” Public Administration Review 37: 478–487.
Davidoff, Paul (1965). “Advocacy and pluralism in planning,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31: 331–338.
Dawes, R. M. and Corrigan, B. (1974). “Linear models in decision making,” Psychological Bulletin 81: 95–106.
Dennis, R., Stewart, T. R., Middleton, P., Downton, M., Ely, D., and Keeling, C. (1983). “Integration of technical and value issues in air quality policy formation: A case study,” Socio-economic Planning Sciences 17: 95–108.
DRCOG (Denver Regional Council of Governments) (1982a). Inventory, Analysis, and Evaluation of Transportation Systems Management Actions for Improving Air Quality. February.
DRCOG (1982b). “Citizen perceptions of air quality and control measures in the Denver region.” Report prepared by DRCOG and distributed to CATF on January 27, 1982.
DRCOG (1982c). DRCOG Notes, May 1982, Vol. 15, No. 5, p. 1.
DRCOG (1982d). 1982 Denver Regional Element of the State Air Quality Implication Plan. February.
Forester, J. (1982). “Planning in the face of power,” Journal of the American Planning Association 48: 67–80.
Gardiner, P. C., and Edwards, W. (1975). “Public values: Multiattribute-utility measurement for social decision making,” in M. F. Kaplan, and S. Schwartz (eds.) Human Judgment and Decision Processes. New York: Academic Press.
Hammond, K. R. and Adelman, L. (1976). “Science, values, and human judgment,” Science 194: 389–396.
Hammond, K. R., Stewart, T. R., Brehmer, B., and Steinmann, D. O. (1975). “Social judgment theory,” in M. F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz (eds.), Human Judgment and Decision Processes. New York: Academic Press.
Ingram, Helen M. and Ullery, Scott J. (1977). “Public participation in environmental decision-making: Substance or illusion?” in J. T. Coppock and W. R. D. Sewell (eds.), Public Participation in Planning. London: Wiley.
Jones, J. Christopher (1970). Design Methods. London: Wiley.
Jordan, D., Arnstein, S., Gray, J., Metcalf, E., Torrey, W., and Mills, F. (1976). Effective Citizen Participation in Transportation Planning. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Kahn, A. J. (1969). Theory and Practice of Social Planning. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Kinstlinger, Jack (1979). “Institutional factors in the implementation of auto restriction measures.” Paper prepared for the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. January 15.
Lindblom, C. E. (1968). The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
MacRae, D. Jr. (1973). “Science and the formation of policy in a democracy,” Minerva 11: 288–242.
Majone, G. (1975). “The feasibility of social policies,” Policy Sciences 6: 49–69.
Masser, I. (1982). “The analysis of planning processes: Some methodological considerations,” Environment and Planning B 9: 5–14.
McAllister, D. M. (1980). Evaluation in Environmental Planning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Nash, Christopher, Pearce, David and Stanley, John (1975). “Criteria for evaluating project evaluation techniques,” Journal of the American Planning Association 41: 83–89.
Nelkin, Dorothy and Pollak, Michael (1979). “Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusion?” Technology Review, pp. 55-63.
Organization for Social and Technical Innovation (1969). Six-Month Progress Report to Office of Economic Opportunity, Region 1, February 1, pp. 27, 28, and 35.
Rittel, Horst W. J. and Webber, Melvin M. (1973). “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning,” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
Starr, Martin K. and Zeleny, Milan (1977). “MCDM-State and future of the arts,” TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 6: 5–29.
Stewart, T. R. (1983). “Visual air quality values: Public input and informed choice,” in R. D. Rowe and L. G. G. Chestnut (eds.), Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Stewart, T. R. (1973). “The linear model in attitude measurement: An example and some comments,” Educational and Psychological Measurement 33: 285-290.
Stewart, T. R., and Gelberd, L. (1976). “Analysis of judgment policy: A new approach for citizen participation in planning,” American Institute of Planners Journal (January) pp. 33-41.
Stewart, T. R., and Steinmann, Derick O. (1973). “Community goals: A study of relative importance.” University of Colorado: Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, Boulder, CO, Report No. 156.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (1981). Central Arizona Water Control Study, Appendix B, Public Values Assessment.
Verba, S. (1969). “Democratic participation,” in B. M. Gross (ed.), Social Intelligence for America's Future. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wildavsky, A. (1973). “If planning is everything, maybe its nothing,” Policy Sciences 4: 127–153.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, T.R., Dennis, R.L. & Ely, D.W. Citizen participation and judgment in policy analysis: A case study of urban air quality policy. Policy Sci 17, 67–87 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229729
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229729