Skip to main content
Log in

The competitive NMDA antagonist AP5, but not the non-competitive antagonist MK801, induces a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Rats were trained to alternate responses on a discrete trial working memory task on a T-maze. In Experiment 1, the rats were then matched for choice accuracy and allocated to three treatment groups. These were: implantation of osmotic minipumps for intraventricular infusion of either (a) 15 mM D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5) or (b) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (VEH); and an unoperated control group (UNOP). In Phase 1 we assessed alternation performance with a minimal delay between responses: the UNOP and VEH rats continued to choose accurately; the AP5 rats showed an impairment of choice accuracy, but recovered over days. In Phase 2 a 20-s delay between responses was enforced, and choice accuracy was assessed following injections either of saline or of Milacemide HC1 (10 mg/kg). There was now a severe and enduring impairment of choice accuracy in the AP5 group, but Milacemide injections did not affect performance in any of the treatment groups. In Experiment 2 rats were trained in a similar way, and then given intraperitoneal injections of MK801 or of physiological saline in a within-subjects design and tested for T-maze performance with a minimal or a 20-s delay between responses. In the first Phase, MK801 was given 10-min before behavioural testing commenced; in the second Phase, it was given 28–40 min before behavioural testing commenced. The outcome depended critically on the time between drug injection and testing. There was a significant drug-induced impairment of choice accuracy in both Phases; but in Phase 1 there was no impairment in testing with a minimal retention interval and an impairment with a 20-s retention interval. In Phase 2, the impairment was significant at both retention intervals. We conclude that AP5, but not MK801, interferes with temporary memory storage in a delay-dependent manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham WC, Mason SE (1988) Effects of the NMDA receptor/channel antagonists CPP and MK801 on hippocampal field potentials and long-term potentiation in anesthetized rats. Brain Res 462:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggleton JP, Hunt PR, Rawlins JNP (1986) The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and nonspatial tests of working memory. Behav Brain Res 19:133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Boitano JJ, Dokla CJP, Mulinski P, Misikonis S, Kaluzynski T (1980) Effects of hippocampectomy in an incremental-step DRL paradigm. Physiol Behav 25:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CVH, Isaacson RL (1965) Effect of hippocampal ablation on DRL performance. J Comp Physiol Psychol 59:137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Clineschmidt BV, Williams M, Witoslawski JJ, Bunting PA, Risley EA, Torato JA (1982) Restoration of shock-suppressed behavior by treatment with (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine (MK801), a substance with potent anticonvulsant, central sympathomimetic, and apparent anxiolytic properties. Drug Dev Res 2:147

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge GL, Kehl SJ, Mclennan J (1983) Excitatory aminoacids in synaptic transmission in the Shaffer collateral-commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. J Physiol (Lond) 334:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge GL, Kehl SJ, Mclennan J (1984) The action of some analogues of the excitatory amino acids in the dentate gyrus of the rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 62:424–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge GL, Bliss TVP (1987) NMDA receptors — their role in long-term potentiation. TINS 10:288–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotman CW, Iversen LL (1987) Excitatory amino acids in the brain — focus on NMDA receptors. TINS 10:263–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington ML, Lynch MA, Bliss TVP (1987) Long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus: induction and increased glutamate release are blocked by D(-) aminophosphonovalerate. Neuroscience 20:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JA, Rawlins JNP (1986) Comparator and buffer memory: an attempt to integrate two models of hippocampal function. In: Isaacson RL, Pribram KH (eds) The hippocampus, Vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 159–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell RF, Morris RGM (1987) Anticonvulsant doses of MK-801 fail to block long-term potentiation in vivo or impair spatial memory in the rat. Neurosci Lett Suppl 29:S99

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris EW, Ganong AH, Cotman CW (1984) Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus involves activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Brain Res 323:132–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JW, Ascher P (1987) Glycine potentiates the NMDA response in cultured mouse brain neurons. Nature 325:529–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman DA, McIntosh DC, Thomas GV (1979) Learning when reward is delayed: a marking hypothesis. J Exp Psychol (Anim Behav Proc) 5:224–242

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton BL, Morris RGM (1987) Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system. TINS 10:408–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondadori G, Weiskrantz L, Buerki F, Petschke F, Fagg GE (1989) NMDA receptor antagonists can enhance or impair learning performance in animals. Exp Brain Res 75:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RGM (1989) Synaptic plasticity and learning: selective impairment of learning in rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5. J Neurosci 9:3040–3057

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RGM, Garrud P, Rawlins JNP, O'Keefe J (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RGM, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M (1986) Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319:774–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins JNP (1985) Associations across time: the hippocampus as a temporary memory store. Behav Brain Sci 8:479–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins JNP (1986) Modes of action of post-trial manipulations of learning: memories lost and memories regained. Acta Neurologica Scand 74:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins JNP, Olton DS (1982) The septo-hippocampal system and cognitive mapping. Behav Brain Res 5:331–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins JNP, Tsaltas E (1983) The hippocampus, time and working memory. Behav Brain Res 10:233–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GS Jr, Crooks GB Jr, Shinkman PG, Gallagher M (1989) Behavioral effects of MK-801 mimic deficits associated with hippocampal damage. Psychobiology 17:156–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss J, Feldon J, Rawlins JNP (1990) Section of the descending columns of the fornix produces delay- and interference-dependent working memory deficits. Behav Brain Res 36:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss J, Morris RGM, Rawlins JNP (1988) Intra-ventricular infusion of the NMDA antagonist AP5 impairs performance on a non-spatial DRL task in the rat. Exp Brain Res 73:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner AR, Rudy JW, Whitlow JW (1973) Rehearsal in animal conditioning. J Exp Psychol Monograph 97:407–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts J, Balster RL (1988) Phencyclidine-like discriminative properties of MK-801 in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 146:167–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tonkiss, J., Rawlins, J.N.P. The competitive NMDA antagonist AP5, but not the non-competitive antagonist MK801, induces a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats. Exp Brain Res 85, 349–358 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229412

Key words

Navigation