Skip to main content
Log in

A metric for assessing acuity in positioning joints and limbs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method for assessing the exactness of sensing and setting the positions of joints and limbs, using a measure we call target resolution. Target resolution, derived from information theory but ultimately based on variance, estimates the fewest number of discrete, equally spaced targets required within a range to provide the maximum possible information transfer from any target set. We argue that target resolution provides better insight into the exactness of position sense than does the usual measure of accuracy based on mean or constant error. Studies have shown that measures of mean error in setting or indicating positions of joints or limbs exhibit lability; they drift and show considerable sensitivity to factors such as previous positions of the limb and learning. We derive the equation for calculating target resolution and give example resolutions for several joints we have tested. Target resolution often gives a quite different impression of proprioceptive exactness than do measures of accuracy based on mean error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braida LD, Durlach NI (1972) Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. J Acoust Soc Am 51:372–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark FJ (1995) Assessing accuracy of positioning joints and limbs. In: Ferrell WR, Proske U (ed) Neural control of movement. Plenum, New York, pp 67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Craske B, Cranshaw M (1974) Differential errors of kinesthesis produced by previous limb positions. J Mot Behav 6:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlach NI, Braida LD (1969) Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. J Acoust Soc Am 46:372–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner WR (1962) Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner WR, Hake HW (1951) The amount of information in absolute judgements. Psychol Rev 58:446–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth HL (1910) The central tendency of judgement. J Philos Psychol Sci Methods 7:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtsma AJM (1983) Estimation of mutual information from limited experimental data. J Acoust Soc Am 74:1626–1629

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Anstis T (1974) Muscular and joint-receptor components in postural persistence. J Exp Psychol 103:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA (1989) Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds. Perception 18:681–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim JS, Rabinowitz WM, Braida LD, Durlach NI (1977) Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 62:1256–1267

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae AW (1970) Channel capacity in absolute judgement tasks: an artifact of information bias? Psychol Bull 73:112–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1954) Notes on the bias of information estimates. In: Quastler H (ed) Information theory in psychology. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill, pp 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1956) The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray N (1967) Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychol 27:84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton EC (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychol Bull 86:777–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding GM, Wallace B (1990) Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. J Mot Behav 22:209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackitt B, Lestienne F, Zeffiro A (1983) The information transmitted at final position in visually triggered forearm movements. Biol Cybern 46:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass JG (1975). Psychophysics. In: Scharf B (ed) Experimental sensory psychology. Scott, Glenview, Ill, pp 16–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS, Greenbaum HB (1966) Regression effect in psychophysical judgement. Percept Psychophys 1:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann JP, Ibrahim SF (1992) Does limb proprioception drift? Exp Brain Res 91:162–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, F.J., Larwood, K.J., Davis, M.E. et al. A metric for assessing acuity in positioning joints and limbs. Exp Brain Res 107, 73–79 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228018

Key words

Navigation