Skip to main content
Log in

An anisotropy of human tactile sensitivity and its relation to the visual oblique effect

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ability of humans to detect striated stimuli on the distal phalanges was found to be highly anisotropic. Observers were much more sensitive to stripes presented in the proximal-distal orientation than to stripes in any other orientation. This tactile anisotropy was contrasted with the well-known visual anisotropy in which sensitivity is greatest for stripes at the horizontal and vertical orientations. We suggest that both the tactile anisotropy and the visual anisotropy are caused by corresponding anisotropies in the distribution of preferred orientations of orientation-selective neurons with in the respective modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelle S (1972) Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the oblique effect in man and animals. Psychol Bul 78:266–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkley MA, Kitterle F, Watkins DM (1975) Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity. Vision Res 15:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell FW, Kulikowski JJ, Levinson J (1966) The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. J Physiol (Lond) 187:427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo RM, Gardner EP (1980) A quantitative analysis of responses of direction-sensitive neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 43:1319–1341

    Google Scholar 

  • DeValois RL, Yund EW, Hepler N (1982) The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Essock EA (1980) The oblique effect of stimulus identification considered with respect to two classes of oblique effects. Perception 9:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Essock EA (1982) Anisotropies of perceived contrast and detection speed. Vision Res 22:1185–1191

    Google Scholar 

  • Essock EA (1990) The influence of stimulus length on the oblique effect of contrast sensitivity. Vision Res 30:1243–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EP, Costanzo RM (1980) Neuronal mechanisms underlying direction sensitivity of somatosensory cortical neurons in awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 43:1342–1354

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection and psychophysics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas JH (1991) Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci 14:137–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy H, Martin K, Orban GA, Whitteridge D (1985) Receptive field properties of neurones in visual area 1 and visual area 2 in the baboon. Neuroscience 14:405–415

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte RH and Srinivasan MA (1987) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1655–1671

    Google Scholar 

  • Leehey SC, Moskowitz A, Brill S, Held R (1975) Orientation anisotropy in infant vision. Science 190:900–902

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: a user's guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffei L, Campbell FW (1970) Neurophysiological localization of the vertical and horizontal visual coordinates in man. Science 167:386–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield RJW (1974) Neural basis of orientation perception in primate vision. Science 186:1133–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield RJW, Ronner SF (1978) Orientation anisotropy in monkey visual cortex. Brain Res 149:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DE, Freeman RD, Westheimer G (1967) Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity for interference fringes on the retina. J Opt Soc Am 57:246–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Orban G, Vandenbussche E, Vogels R (1984) Meridional variations and other properties suggesting that acuity and orientation discrimination rely on different neuronal mechanisms. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 4:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981a) Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 46:1192–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981b) Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. J Neurophysiol 46:1204–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pubols M, LeRoy RF (1977) Orientation detectors in the primary somatosensory neocortex of the raccoon. Brain Res 129:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MA (1989) Surface deflection of primate fingertip under line load. J Biomech 22:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J, Dreher B, Leventhal A (1979) Hierarchical and parallel mechanisms in the organization of visual cortex. Brain Res Rev 1:345–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MM (1963) Visual discrimination and orientation. J Opt Soc Am [A] 53:763–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Timney BN, Muir DW (1976) Orientation anisotropy: incidence and magnitude in Caucasian and Chinese subjects. Science 193:699–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbussche E, Orban GA (1983) Meridional variations in the line orientation discrimination of the cat. Behav Brain Res 9:237–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren W, Hamalainen HA, Gardner EP (1986) Objective classification of motionand direction-sensitive neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 56:598–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemon V, Gutowski W, Horton T (1983) Orientational anisotropy in the human visual system: an evoked potential and psychophysical study. Int J Neurosci 19:259–286

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Essock, E.A., Krebs, W.K. & Prather, J.R. An anisotropy of human tactile sensitivity and its relation to the visual oblique effect. Exp Brain Res 91, 520–524 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227848

Key words

Navigation