Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of the nuclear ribosomal DNA units and phylogeny of Beta L. wild forms and cultivated beets

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The nuclear rDNA units of species belonging to the genus Beta were characterized using heterologous probes of flax (entire unit and 25S) and sunflower (6.1-kb Eco fragment containing the 18S, the entire intergenic spacer (IGS) and a small piece of the 25S). The physical maps of one species from each section of the genus was constructed by localization of the EcoRI, BamHI, HindIII, KpnI and SacI restriction sites. For each species a single individual was used to obtain total DNA. The major unit length is 11 kb, but variant length units at 10.4, 10.7 and 11.3 kb were found as minor forms. However, some individuals carried the 10.4-kb or the 10.7-kb variant length unit as the major form. For the variant length units of one species the restriction sites were conserved, so that the variation in length occurred in the IGS. The EcoRI fragment corresponding to the intergenic spacer appeared to be the best indicator of variation. The variable sequence in the IGS sometimes generated new restriction sites for the Corollinae and mainly, did so, for the Vulgares relative to the Procumbentes. The variable sites were able, to differentiate the three sections and species within the sections. Corollinae species belong to two different groups according to the absence or the presence of the BamHI (B4) site. The Vulgares species contain several unit types. We proposed that all the unit types derived from a unique unit, V-11-2.3, by unequal crossing-overs or conversion. We also supposed a homogenization mechanism because we found individuals homogeneous for every unit type. Among the cultivated beets, all the root beets contain only one rDNA unit type, V-11-2.9. Thus, we supposed that the common unit type of cultivated beets either brings a physiological advantage or is strictly linked to a favorable allele. It is likely that the rDNA unit of B. maritima were eliminated from sugar beet by the breeding process since they were not recovered. Whatever the process, we deduced that all the cultivated forms of beets likely originated in a unique plant ascendant.

A phylogenic tree of the genus is proposed, based on the nuclear rDNA maps, and subsequently discussed relative to the systematic tree and other molecular phylogenies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appels R, Dvorak J (1982) The wheat ribosomal DNA spacer region: its structure and variation in populations and among species. Theor Appl Genet 63:337–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Appels R, Gerlach WL, Dennis ES, Swift H, Peacock WJ (1980) Molecular and chromosomal organisation of DNA sequences coding for the ribosomal RNA in cereals. Chromosoma 78:293–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Barocka KH (1966) Die Sektion Corollinae der Gattung (Tournef) L. Z Pflanzenzucht 56:379–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonavent JF, Bessone L, Geny A, Bervillé A, Denizot JP, Brian C (1989) A possible origin for the sugar beet cytoplasmic male sterility source Owen. Genome 32:322–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1969) Interspecific hybridization in Beta. J Inst Sugar beet Res. 4:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO, Bormotov VE (1971) Chromosome morphology in a homozygous line of sugar beet. Hereditas 69:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin V, Pennenbecker G, Ecke W, Schewe G, Saumitou-Laprade P, Jean R, Vernet P, Michaelis G (1987) Cytoplasmic male sterility and nuclear genes in a natural population of Beta maritima: genetical and theoretical aspects. Theor Appl Genet 73:625–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Choumane W, Heizmann P (1988) Structure and variability of nuclear ribosomal genes in the genus Helianthus. Theor Appl Genet 76:481–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover G (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 299:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer HE (1989) Origin of the “Weiss Schlesische Rübe” (White Silesian beet) and resynthesis of sugar beet. Euphytica 41:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese L, Van Hintum Th (1989) The international data base for Beta. In: International crop network, series 3. IBPGR, Rome, pp 17–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche K, Metzlaff M, Melzer R, Hagemann R (1987) Comparative restriction endonuclease analysis and molecular cloning of plastid DNAs from wild species and cultivated varieties of the genus Beta (L). Theor Appl Genet 74:589–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsbrough PB, Cullis CA (1981) Characterization of the genes for ribosomal DNA in flax. Nucleic Acids Res 9:1301–1309

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle J, Timmis JN, Sinclair J (1975) The relationship between satellite DNA, ribosomal RNA gene redundancy, and genome size in plants. Plant Physiol 55:496–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque H, Vedel F, Mathieu C, de Courcel AGL (1990) Identification of a short rDNA spacer sequence highly specific of a tomato line containing Tm-1 gene introgressed from Lycopersicum hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 80:602–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikami T, Kishima Y, Suguira M, Kinoshita T (1985) Organelle genome diversity in sugar beet with normal and different sources of male sterile cytoplasms. Theor Appl Genet 71:166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamine T, Todd GA, McKann KP, Newbury HJ, Ford-Lloyd BV (1989) Use of restriction fragment length polymorphism to fingerprint beets at the genotype and species levels. Theor Appl Genet 78:847–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonuclease. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheford TR, Osterman JC, Gardner CO (1990) Variation in the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer of maize population mass-selected for high grain yield. Theor Appl Genet 79:793–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1987) Ribosomal RNA genes in plants: variability in copy number and in the intergenic spacer. Plant Mol Biol 9:509–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni S, Faivre-Rampant P, Moreau E, Bervillé A (1991) Rapid control of purity for the cytoplasm of male sterile seed stocks by means of a dot hybridization assay. Mol Cell Probes 5:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Shagai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern E (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanescu Z (1990) Un point de vue concernant la classification du genre Beta. J Inst Sugar beet, Dijon, Res 25:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Gimbel EM, Wricke G (1989) Are Beta procumbens Chr. Sm. and Beta webbiana Moq. different species? Plant Breed 102:17–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. F. Linskens

This work was supported by grant No. 9157A between INRA and the companies Deleplanque et Cie, SES France, Maribo France, Graines Franco Suédoises, KWS France and Van der Have France

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santoni, S., Bervillé, A. Characterization of the nuclear ribosomal DNA units and phylogeny of Beta L. wild forms and cultivated beets. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 83, 533–542 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226896

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226896

Key words

Navigation