Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Changes that may have occurred over the past 50 years of hybrid breeding in maize (Zea maize L.) with respect to heterosis for yield and heterozygosity at the molecular level are of interest to both maize breeders and quantitative geneticists. The objectives of this study were twofold: The first, to compare two diallels produced from six older maize inbreds released in the 1950's and earlier and six newer inbreds released during the 1970's with respect to (a) genetic variation for restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and (b) the size of heterosis and epistatic effects, and the second, to evaluate the usefulness of RFLP-based genetic distance measures in predicting heterosis and performance of single-cross hybrids. Five generations (parents, F1; F2, and backcrosses) from the 15 crosses in each diallel were evaluated for grain yield and yield components in four Iowa environments. Genetic effects were estimated from generation means by ordinary diallel analyses and by the Eberhart-Gardner model. Newer lines showed significantly greater yield for inbred generations than did older lines but smaller heterosis estimates. In most cases, estimates of additive x additive epistatic effects for yield and yield components were significantly positive for both groups of lines. RFLP analyses of inbred lines included two restriction enzymes and 82 genomic DNA clones distributed over the maize genome. Eighty-one clones revealed polymorphisms with at least one enzyme. In each set, about three different RFLP variants were typically found per RFLP locus. Genetic distances between inbred lines were estimated from RFLP data as Rogers' distance (RD), which was subdivided into general (GRD) and specific (SRD) Rogers' distances within each diallel. The mean and range of RDs were similar for the older and newer lines, suggesting that the level of heterozygosity at the molecular level had not changed. GRD explained about 50% of the variation among RD values in both sets. Cluster analyses, based on modified Rogers' distances, revealed associations among lines that were generally consistent with expectations based on known pedigree and on previous research. Correlations of RD and SRD with f1 performance, specific combining ability, and heterosis for yield and yield components, were generally positive, but too small to be of predictive value. In agreement with previous studies, our results suggest that RFLPs can be used to investigate relationships among maize inbreds, but that they are of limited usefulness for predicting the heterotic performance of single crosses between unrelated lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RJ (1978) Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18:533–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr B, Evola SV, Burr FA, Beckman JS (1983) The application of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to plant breeding. In: Setlow JK, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic engineering principles and methods, vol 5. Plenum Press, London, pp 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr B, Burr FA, Thompson KH, Albertson MC, Stuber CW (1988) Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics 118:519–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleberry RM, Crum CW, Krull CF (1984) Genetic yield improvement of U.S. maize cultivars under varying fertility and climatic environments. Crop Sci 24:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (1984) Genetic contributions to yield gains of U.S. hybrid maize, 1930 to 1980. In: Fehr WR (ed) Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants. Spec Publ 7, Crop Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, pp 15–47

    Google Scholar 

  • East EM (1908) Inbreeding in corn. Conn Agric Exp Stn Rep 1907, pp 419–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart SA, Gardner CO (1966) A general model for genetic effects. Biometrics 22:864–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantiative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Godshalk EB, Lee M, Lamkey KR (1990) Analysis of the relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to maize single-cross hybrid performance. Theor Appl Genet (in press)

  • Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1983) Races of maize. VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia. Maydica 28:169–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KR (1988) Com breeding. In Sprague GF, Dudley JW (ed) Corn and corn improvement, 3rd edn. Agronomy Monograph 18. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 463–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Helentjaris T (1987) A genetic linkage map for maize based on RFLPs. Trends Genet 3:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CB (1984) Maize research and breeders manual no. 10. Illinois Foundation Seeds, Champaign, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoisington DA (1987) Maize (Zea mays L.) RFLP clones and linkage map ⊕ public set. (abstract) Genetics 116:527

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamkey KR, Smith OS (1987) Performance and inbreeding depression of populations representing seven eras of maize breeding. Crop Sci 27:695–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR, Woodman WW (1989) Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci 29:1067–1071

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EA, Lee M, Lamkey KR (1990) Molecular marker analysis of Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet (in press)

  • Meghji MR, Dudley JW, Lambert RJ, Sprague GF (1984) Inbreeding depression, inbred and hybrid grain yields, and other traits of maize genotypes representing three eras. Crop Sci 24:545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Geiger HH, Schnell FW (1986) Epistasis in maize (Zea mays L.). 2. Genetic effects in crosses among early flint and dent inbred lines determined by three methods. Theor Appl Genet 72:231–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR, Woodman WL (1990) Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms and its relationship to genetic effects estimated from generation means in four sets of maize inbreds. Crop Sci (in press)

  • Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Fortuna JV, Johnson EC (1965) The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers JS (1972) Measures of similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics VII. University of Texas Publ 7213:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell WA (1984) Agronomic performance of maize cultivars representing different eras of breeding. Maydica 29:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1988) SAS language guide for personal computers. Release 6.03 edition. SAS Inst, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull GH (1909) A pure line method of corn breeding. Am Breeder's Assoc Rep 5:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield GH (1959) Maize inbred lines of Ohio. Ohio Agric Exp Stn Res Bull 831

  • Stuber CW (1989) Marker-based selection for quantitative traits. In: Proc XII Congress of EUCARPIA. Vortr Pflanzenzucht 16:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW, Edwards MD, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular markerfacilitated investigations of quantitative loci in maize. II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci 27:639–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 56:330–338

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Joint contribution from Cereal and Soybean Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service and Journal Paper no. J-13929 of the Iowa Agric and Home Economics Exp Stn, Ames, IA 50011. Projects no. 2818 and 2778

A.E.M. is presently at the Iowa State University on leave from University of Hohenheim, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, Federal Republic of Germany

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melchinger, A.E., Lee, M., Lamkey, K.R. et al. Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 80, 488–496 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226750

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226750

Key words

Navigation