Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of domestication on the genetic variability in the orange carrot, cultivated Daucus carota ssp. sativus and the genetic homogeneity of various cultivars

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Isozyme analysis of wild and domesticated accessions indicated that domestication of the cultivated carrot Daucus carota ssp. sativus resulted in an insignificant reduction of all genetic variability and genetic distance estimates. Although they are less variable genetically, cultivated forms maintain a high proportion of observed heterozygosity. Relative to the overall genetic variability of the species, samples from four common cultivars ‘Red Cored Chantenay’, ‘Scarlet Nantes’, ‘Danvers Half Long’ and ‘A Plus’ demonstrated a high degree of genetic similarity. This is attributed to the recent development of orange cultivars and the limited gene pool utilized in their development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arus P (1983) Genetic purity of commercial seed lots. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 415–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Babb MF, Kraus JE, Magruder R (1950) Synonymy of orange fleshed varieties of carrots. Circular no. 833, US Dept Agric, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banga O (1976) Carrot. In: Simmonds NW (ed) evolution of crop plants. Longman, London, pp 291–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer RJ, Crawford DJ (1986) Allozyme divergence among five diploid species of Antennaria (Asteraceae:Inuleae) and their allopolyploid derivatives. Am J Bot 73:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ADH (1978) Isozymes, plant population genetic structure and genetic conservation. Theor Appl Genet 52:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ADH (1979) Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor Popul Biol 15:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardy BJ, Stuber CW, Goodman MM (1981) Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize (Zea mays L.). Institute of Statistics mimeograph ser no. 1317. North Carolina State University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Marshall DL (1985) The impact of domestication on distribution of allozyme variation within and among cultivars of radish, Raphanus sativus L. Theor Appl Genet 69:393–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb LD (1981) Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog Phytochem 7:1–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goff ES (1880) Sixth annual report of the board of control of the New York Experimental Station. Troy Press, New York, pp 133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Linhart YB, Mitton JB (1979) Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Annu Rev Syst Ecol 10:173–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Helweg L (1908) A monograph of cultivated carrot varieties and a contribution to the historical study of their cultivation (in Swedish). Tidsskr Landbrugets Planteavl 15:417–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1976) Consequences of long term artificial selection, inbreeding and isolation in Phlox. 2. The organization of allozymic variability. Evolution 30:463–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Magruder R, Boswell VR, Ensweller SL, Miller JC, Hutchins AE, Wood JF, Parker MM, Zimmerley HH (1940) Description of types of principle American varieties of orange fleshed carrots. USDA publ no 361. Washington, D.C.

  • Nei M (1972) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Genetic distances between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ, Kishpaugh J, Kirk D (1974) Numerical taxonomy system of multivariate statistical programs. State University of New York, Stoney Brook

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. F. H. Freeman, San Fransisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Haufler CH, Darrow DC, Gastony GJ (1983) Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. Am Fern J 73:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre MD (1989) An electrophoretic survey of the genetic variability within the Daucus carota complex (Apiaceae: Caucalideae) M.Sc. thesis, University of Windsor, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre MD, Bayer RJ, Weis IM (1990) An isozyme-based assessment of the genetic variability within the Daucus carota L. complex (Apiaceae: Caucalideae) Can J Bot 68:2449–2457

    Google Scholar 

  • Suurs LCJM (1986) Routine large-scale electrophoresis for plant breeding. An example with F1 seeds of brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var gemmifera'). Euphytica 36:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (1983) Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, parts A & B. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilmorin-Andrieux MM (1885) Carrot. In: Robinson W (ed) Vegetable garden (English edn). John Murray, London, pp 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitkus R (1985) FORTRAN program for computing genetic statistics from allelic frequency data. J Hered 76:142

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnheimer EHM, Brandenburg WA, Ter Borg SJ (1989) Interactions between wild and cultivated carrots (Daucus carota L.) in the Netherlands. Euphytica 40:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1988) SY STAT; the system for statistics. SY STAT, Evarston, Ill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

St. Pierre, M.D., Bayer, R.J. The impact of domestication on the genetic variability in the orange carrot, cultivated Daucus carota ssp. sativus and the genetic homogeneity of various cultivars. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 82, 249–253 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226221

Key words

Navigation