Skip to main content
Log in

Marker-based estimates of identity by descent and alikeness in state among maize inbreds

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular markers are useful for determining relationships and similarity among inbreds, especially if the proportion of marker loci with alleles common to inbreds i and j is partitioned into: (1) the probability that marker alleles are identical by descent (Mfij); and (2) the conditional probability that marker alleles are alike in state, given that they are not identical by descent (θ ij). Our objectives were to: develop a method, based on tabular analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism marker data, for estimating Mfij, θ ij, and the parental contribution to inbred progeny; validate the accuracy of the method with a simulated data set; and compare the pedigree-based coefficient of coancestry (fij) and Mfij among a set of maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds. Banding patterns for 73 probeenzyme combinations were determined among 13 inbreds. Iterative estimation of Mfij, θ ij, and the parental contribution to progeny was performed with procedures similar to a tabular analysis of pedigree data. Deviations of Mfij from pedigree-based fij ranged from 0.002 to 0.288, indicating large effects of selection and/or drift during inbreeding for some inbreds. Differences between marker-based estimates and expected values of parental contribution to inbred progeny were as large as 0.205. Results for a simulated set of inbreds indicated that tabular analysis of marker data provides more accurate estimates of Mfij and θ ij than other methods described in the literature. Tabular analysis requires the availability of marker data for all the progenitors of each inbred. When marker data are not available for the parents of a given inbred, Mfij and θ ij may still be calculated if parental contributions to the inbred are assumed equal to their expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernardo R (1993) Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor Appl Genet 85:1055–1062

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1996a) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize singlecross performance. Crop Sci 36:50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1996b) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize singlecross performance given erroneous inbred relationships. Crop Sci 36: (Jul-Aug issue)

  • Cowen NM, Frey KJ (1987) Relationship between genealogical distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.) Euphytica 36:413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW (1994) Comparison of genetic distance estimators using molecular marker data. In: Analysis of molecular marker data. Proc Joint Symp Am Soc Hort Sci/Crop Sci Soc Am, 5–6 Aug 1994, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, pp 3–7

  • Efron B (1981) The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Soc Ind Appl Math, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Emik LO, Terrill CE (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 40:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter RB (1989) ASIA approach on minimum distance. Corn Sorghum Industry Res Conf 44:193–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen LL, Boutin S, Young N, Specht JE, Shoemaker RC (1995) Soybean pedigree analysis using map-based molecular markers: I. Tracking RFLP markers in cultivars. Crop Sci 35:1326–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1988) Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol 5:584–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Malécot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l'hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lamkey KR (1991) Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci 31:669–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Murigneux A, Barloy D, Leroy P, Beckert M (1993) Molecular and morphological evaluation of doubled haploid lines in maize. 1. Homogeneity within DH lines. Theor Appl Genet 86:837–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Panter DM, Allen FL (1995) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean: I. Choosing parents. Crop Sci 35:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza E, Sorrells ME (1989) Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci 29:595–601

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernardo, R., Murigneux, A. & Karaman, Z. Marker-based estimates of identity by descent and alikeness in state among maize inbreds. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 93, 262–267 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225755

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225755

Key words

Navigation