Abstract
Despite the great economic importance of citrus, its phylogeny and taxonomy remain a matter of controversy. Moreover pathogens of increased virulence and dramatic environmental changes are currently spreading or emerging. The objectives of the present paper, measuring genetic variability and studying its pattern of distribution, are crucial steps to optimize sampling strategies in the search of genotypes that tolerate or resist these threatening factors within the huge array of Citrus and Citrus related species. Their intraspecific and intrageneric variability was studied comparatively by means of ten enzymatic systems using eight different measures. The analysis of ten enzymatic systems allowed us to distinguish all the species and all but one artificial hybrid. The species with the lowest genotypic variability are C. myrtifolia, C. deliciosa (willow leaf mandarin), C. paradisi (grapefruit), C. limon (lemon) and C. sinensis (sweet orange), while Severinia buxifolia shows the highest value. A broad spectrum of heterozygosity values was found in the collection. Lemons (C. limon, C. meyeri, C. karna, C. volkameriana), limes (C. aurantifolia, C. limettioides, C. lattifolia) and C. bergamia show a very high percentage of heterozygosity which indicates an origin through interspecific hybridization. Two main factors limit genetic intraspecific variability: apomictic reproduction, where nucellar embryos are much more vigorous than the zygotic ones, and nurserymen selecting against variability in the seedling stage of the rootstocks or in propagating the scion cultivars vegetatively. Additionally, self-pollination appears in some species mainly used as rootstocks which would explain their low heterozygosity values. Genetic differences between species and genera are in general high, which suggests that adaptation might have played an important role during the evolution of the orange subfamily.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almansa MS, del Rio LA, Alcaraz CF, Sevilla F (1989) Isoenzyme pattern of superoxide dismutase in different varieties of citrus plants. Physiol Plant 76:563–568
Asíns MJ, Carbonell EA (1987) Concepts involved in measuring genetic variability and its importance in conservation of plant genetic resources. Evol Trends Plants 1:51–61
Asíns MJ, Carbonell EA (1989) Distribution of genetic variability in a durum wheat collection. Theor Appl Genet 77:287–294
Asíns MJ, Herrero R, Navarro L (1995) Factors affecting tree isozyme-gene expression. Theor Appl Genet 90:892–898
Bacchi O (1943) Cytological observations in Citrus. III. Megasporogenesis, fertilization and polyembryony. Bot Gaz 105:221–225
Barret MC, Rhodes AM (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated Citrus and its close relatives. Systematic Bot 1:105–135
Benzecri JP (1970) Distance distributionelle et metrique chi-deux en analyse factorielle des correspondences. Laboratoire de Statistique Math., Paris
Bretó MP, Asíns MJ, Carbonell EA (1993) Genetic variability in Lycopersicon species and their genetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 86:113–120
Cameron JW, Garber MJ (1968) Identical-twin hybrids of Citrus Poncirus from strictly sexual seed parents. Amer J Bot 55:199–205
Carpenter JB, Reece PC (1969) Catalog of genera, species and subordinate taxa in the orange subfamily Aurantoideae (Rutaceae). Agricultural Research Service ARS, USDA
Castle WS (1987) Citrus rootstocks. In: Rom RC, Carlson RF (eds) Rootstocks for fruit crops. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 361–399
Castle WS, Pelosi RR, Youtsey CO, Gmitter Jr, Lee RF, Powell CA, Hu X (1992) Rootstocks similar to sour orange for Florida Citrus tree. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 105:56–60
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards WF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257
Chao H-Y, Chiang Y-H, Chang C-B, Chiu C-S, Su W-F (1979) Distribution of seedling yellows tristeza virus in citrus and the tristeza susceptibility of six sour orange rootstocks. Acta Phytopathol Sinica 9:61–72
FAO (1994) Statistical summary of agricultural production. FAO Quart Bull Stat 7:14
Frost HB (1926) Polyembryony, heterozygosity and chimeras in citrus. Hilgardia 1:365–402
Frost HB, Soost RK (1968) Seed reproduction: development of gametes and embryos. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Barchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley, pp 290–324
Green RM, Vardi A, Galun E (1986) The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among Citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera. Theor Appl Genet 72:170–177
Guerra MS (1984) Cytogenetics of Rutaceae. II. Nuclear DNA content. Caryologia 37:219–226
Guerra MS (1993) Cytogenetics of rutaceae. V. High chromosomal variability in Citrus species revealed by CMA/DAPI staining. Heredity 71:234–241
Hillis DM (1984) Misuse and modification of Nei's distance. Systematic Zool 33:238240
Iwamasa M, Nito N (1988) Cytogenetics and the evolution of modern cultivated citrus. In: Goren R, Mendel K (ed) Proc 6th Int Citrus Cong Margraf Scientific Books, Weikersheim, pp 265–275
Iwamase M, Nito N, Ling JT (1988) Intra- and inter-generic hybridization in the orange subfamily, Aurantioideae Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:123–130
Khan IA, Roose ML (1988) Frequency and characteristics of nucellar and zygotic seedlings in three cultivars of trifoliate orange. J Am Soc Hort Sci 113:105–110
Moore GA, Castle WS (1988) Morphology and isozymic analysis of open-pollinated citrus rootstock populations. J Hered 79:59–63
Navarro L, Juarez J, Pina JA, Ballester JF, Arregui JM (1988) The citrus variety improvement program in Spain after eleven years. In: Timmer LW, Garnsey SM, Navarro L (eds) Proc 10th Conf Int Organization Citrus Virology. University of California, Riverside, pp 400–406
Ortiz JM (1986) Nomenclatura botánica de los cítricos. Fruits 41:199–209
Patterson C (ed.) (1987) Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pérez de la Vega M (1993) Biochemical characterization of populations. In: Hayward MD, Bosemark NO, Romagosa I (eds) Plant breeding. Chapman and Hall, Cambridge, pp 184–212
Raghuvanshi SS (1962) Cytological studies in genus Citrus. IV. Evolution in the genus Citrus. Cytologia 27:172–188
Roose ML (1988) Isozyme and DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms in citrus breeding and systematic. Proc. 6th Int Citrus Cong, pp 155–165
Roose ML, Cheng FS, Federici CT (1994) Origin, inheritance and effects of a dwarfing gene from the citrus rootstock Poncirus trifoliata “Flying Dragon”. HortScience 29:482
Scora RW, Kumamoto J (1983) Chemotaxonomy of the genus Citrus. In: Waterman PG, Grundon MF (eds.) Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of the rutales. Academic Press, London, pp 343–351
Singh R, Nath N (1969) Practical approach to the classification of citrus. Proc 1st Int Citrus Symp 1:435–440
Soost RK (1964) Self-incompatibility in Citrus grandis (Linn.) Osbeck, Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 84:137–140
Swingle WT (1943) The botany of Citrus and its relatives of the orange subfamily. In: Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley
Swofford DL, Olsen GJ (1990) Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, pp 411–501
Tanaka T (1969) Misunderstanding with regards citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull Univ Osaka Prefect, Ser B Agric 21:139–145
Torres AM, Soost RK, Diedenhofen U (1978) Leaf isozymes as genetic markers in Citrus. Am J Bot 65:869–881
Torres AM, Soost RK, Mau-Lastovicka T (1982) Citrus isozymes. J Hered 73:335–339
Torres AM, Mau-Lastovicka T, Williams TE, Soost RK (1985) Segregation distortion and linkage of Citrus and Poncirus isozyme genes. J Hered 76:289–294
Van Vuuren SP, Greech NM, Collins RP (1991) Reaction of Gou-Tou orange to citrus nematode, Phytophthora and citrus tristeza virus. In: Brlansky RH, Lee RF, Timmer LW (eds) Proc 11th Conf Int Org Citrus Virology. University of California, Riverside, pp 128–134
Wilson AC, Sarich VM, Maxson LR (1974) The importance of gene arrangements in evolution: evidence from studies of rates of chromosomal, protein and anatomical evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:3028–3030
Wilson AC, Carlson SS, White TJ (1977) Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem 46:473–639
Wright S (1978) Evolution and genetics of populations, vol 4. Variability in and among natural populations. University Chicago Press, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by P. M. A. Tigerstedt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrero, R., Asíns, M.J., Carbonell, E.A. et al. Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantioideae. I. Intraspecies and intragenus genetic variability. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 92, 599–609 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224564
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224564