Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of non-linear economic weights for breeding

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Relationships were studied theoretically between phenotypic values of selection candidates (‘parents’) and economic worth of the ‘offspring’ that would belong to production populations. The candidates could include individuals, crosses or clones, and the offspring could be produced either sexually or vegetatively. Cases considered included: three systems for generating production populations [clonal propagation, pair(full-sib)crosses and half-sib crosses]; three economic-worth (profit) functions for individual offspring (linear, intermediate optimum, acceptable versus cull); and independently varying heritabilities for both parents and offspring. The heritabilities were varied in the model against a background of fixed genetic variance. Parental values were considered in terms of phenotypic standard deviations from the population mean, assuming normality. Lower heritabilities and, to a lesser extent, genetic segregation severely damped down the non-linearities of economic worth in relation to measured parental values, such that the linear weightings for traits in a selection index should usually be a good approximation, provided the profit function for individual offspring is monotonic. The economic advantages of corrective mating within a select population may be minimal if both heritabilities are low and the profit functions apply to individual offspring. The economic advantages accruing from genetic uniformity of clones (or crosses between inbreds) in conjunction with non-linear profit functions are strongly dependent on achieving high broad-sense heritabilites, particularly in the offspring (production population).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1970) Handbook of mathematical functions, 9th printing. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allaire F (1980) Mate selection by selection index theory. Theor Appl Genet 57:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh H, Yamada Y (1988) Linear selection indices for non-linear profit functions. Theor Appl Genet 75:553–560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesek J, Baker RJ (1969) Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can J Plant Sci 49:803–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis GM (1962) A selection index for optimum genotype. Biometrics 18:120–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilton JW, Evans DA, Van Vleck LD (1968) Selection indices for quadratic models of total merit. Biometrics 24:937–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Wricke G, Weber WE (1986) Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. S. F. Barker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burdon, R.D. Implications of non-linear economic weights for breeding. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 65–71 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223788

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223788

Key words

Navigation