Skip to main content
Log in

Intergeneric somatic hybrid plantlets between Dianthus barbatus and Gypsophila paniculata obtained by electrofusion

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypocotyl-derived protoplasts of Dianthus barbatus that had been pretreated with iodoacetamide were fused electrically with cell suspension culture-derived protoplasts of Gypsophila paniculata that could divide to form callus but could not regenerate shoots under the culture conditions used in this study. Electrofusion-derived calli which produced shoots were selected as putative somatic hybrids, and plantlets were subsequently regenerated from 2 of these selected calli. These plantlets, which in vitro produced flowers precociously, were identified as intergeneric somatic hybrids by nuclear ribosomal DNA analysis. Normal plants have not been established up to the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fahleson J, Eriksson I, Glimelius K (1994) Intertribal somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Barbarea vulgaris — production of in vitro plantlets. Plant Cell Rep 13:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleba YY, Hoffmann F (1980) “Arabidobrassica”: a novel plant obtained by protoplast fusion. Planta 149:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms CT (1983) Somatic incompatibility in the development of higher plant somatic hybrids. Q Rev Biol 58:325–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnisdaels S, Negrutiu I, Jacobs M, Sidorov V (1988) Plant somatic cell hybridizations: evaluations and prospectives. IAPTC Newsl 55:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers G, Sacristan MD, Holder AA (1978) Somatic hybrid plants of potato and tomato regenerated from fused protoplasts. Carlsberg Res Commun 43:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Mii M (1992) Protoplast culture and plant regeneration of several species in the genus Dianthus. Plant Cell Rep 11:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Mii M (1993a) Somatic hybridization between Dianthus chinensis and D. barbatus through protoplast fusion. Theor Appl Genet 86:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Mii M (1993b) Interspecific somatic hybridization in Dianthus: selection of hybrids by the use of iodoacetamide inactivation and regeneration ability. Plant Sci 88:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Mii M (1993c) Callus and root formation from an intergeneric somatic hybrid between Dianthus caryophyllus and Gypsophila paniculata. Sci Hortic 53:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Mii M (1993d) Application of plant biotechnology for breeding of flower crops in the genus Dianthus. Plant Tissue Cult Lett 10:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Mii M (1995) Plant regeneration from protoplasts in Dianthus: comparison of cultural behavior of different donor tissues. Plant Tissue Cult Lett 12:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Sink KC (1991) Protoplast fusion and somatic hybridization. In: Harding J, Singh F, Mol JNM (eds) Genetics and breeding of ornamental species. Kluwer Academic Publ, The Netherlands, pp 53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Terada R, Kyozuka J, Nishibayashi S, Shimamoto K (1987) Plantlet regeneration from somatic hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing). Mol Gen Genet 210:39–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakano, M., Hoshino, Y. & Mii, M. Intergeneric somatic hybrid plantlets between Dianthus barbatus and Gypsophila paniculata obtained by electrofusion. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 92, 170–172 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223372

Key words

Navigation