This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Bibliography
Diederich, W. (ed.): Theorien der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Beiträge zur diachronischen Wissenschaftstheorie, Frankfurt a.Main 1974.
Feigl, H.: ‘The ‘Orthodox’ View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as well as Critique’, in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV: Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minneapolis 1970, 3–16.
Feigl, H.: ‘Research Programmes and Induction’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (1973), 147–150.
Feyerabend, P. K.: ‘Das Problem der Existenz theoretischer Entitäten’, in E. Topitsch (ed.), Probleme der Wissenschaftstheorie. Festschrift für Victor Kraft, Wien 1960, 35–72.
Feyerabend, P. K.: ‘Problems of Empiricism’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs 1965, 145–260.
Feyerabend, P. K.: ‘Problems of Empiricism, Part II’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theory: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh 1969, 275–353.
Feyerabend, P. K.: ‘Consolations for the Specialist’, in I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 197–230.
Feyerabend, P. K.: ‘Against Method’, in M. Radner, and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV: Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minneapolis 1970, 17–130.
Hanson, N. R.: Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge 1958.
Hempel. C. G.: ‘On the ‘Standard Conception’ of Scientific Theories’, in M. Radner, and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV: Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minneapolis 1970, 142–163.
Hempel, C. G.: ‘The Meaning of Theoretical Terms: A Critique of the standard Empiricist Construal’, in P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja and G. C. Moisil (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV. Proceedings of the 1971 International Congress, Bukarest 1971, Amsterdam (forthcoming).
Hübner, K.: Review of T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Philosophische Rundschau, Jahrg. 15 (1968), 185–195.
Koertge, N.: ‘For and Against Method’, Discussion of P. Feyerabend's [Against], The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 23 (1972), 274–285.
Koertge, N.: ‘Inter-Theoretic Criticism and the Growth of Science’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (1972), 160–173.
Kordig, C. R.: The Justification of Scientific Change, Dordrecht 1971.
Krüger, L., Die systematische Bedeutung wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Pro und Contra Thomas Kuhn, in: Diederich, W. (ed.), Theorien der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Frankfurt a.Main 1974, 210–246.
Kuhn, T. S.: The Copernican Revolution, New York 1957.
Kuhn, T. S.: [Revolutions] The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second enlarged ed. Chicago 1970. German translation of the first ed. by K. Simon: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen, Frankfurt a. Main 1967.
Kuhn, T. S.: ‘Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” in I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 1–23.
Kuhn, T. S.: ‘Reflections on My Critics’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 231–278.
Kuhn, T. S.: ‘Notes on Lakatos’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (1972), 137–146.
Lakatos, I.: [Research Programmes] ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 91–195.
Lakatos, I.: ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (1972), 91–136.
Lakatos, I.: ‘Replies to Critics’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (1972), 174–182.
Masterman, M.: ‘The Nature of a Paradigm’, in I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 59–89.
McKinsey, J. C. C., Sugar, A. C., and Suppes, P. C.,: ‘Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Particle Mechanics’, Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Vol. II (1953), 253–272.
Popper, K. R.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London 1959. German translation by L. Walentik, Logik der Forschung, fifth ed., Tübingen 1973.
Popper, K. R.: Conjectures and Refutations, third ed., London 1969.
Popper, K. R.: Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford 1972.
Popper, K. R.: [Dangers] ‘Normal Science and Its Dangers’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 51–58.
Przelecki, M.: ‘A Set Theoretic Versus a Model Theoretic Approach to the Logical Structure of Physical Theories’. Some Comments on J. Sneed's The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Studia Logica 1974, 91–112.
Putnam, H.: ‘What Theories are Not’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford 1962, 240–251.
Ramsey, F. P.: ‘Theories’, in The Foundations of Mathematics, second ed., Littlefield, N. J. 1960, 212–236.
Scheffler, I.: Science and Subjectivity, New York 1967.
Scheffler, I.: ‘Vision and Revolution: A Postscript on Kuhn’, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 39 (1972), 366–374.
Shapere, D.: Discussion of T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Philosophical Review, Vol. 73 (1964), 383–394.
Shapere, D.: ‘Meaning and Scientific Change’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Mind and Cosmos, Pittsburgh 1966, 41–85.
Simon, H. A.: ‘The Axioms of Newtonian Mechanics’, Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 38 (1947), 88–905.
Simon, H. A.: ‘The Axiomatization of Classical Mechanics’, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 21 (1954), 340–343.
Simon, H. A.: ‘The Axiomatization of Physical Theories’, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 37 (1970), 16–27.
Smart, J. J.: ‘Science, History and Methodology’, Discussion of I. Lakatos, Research Programmes and History, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 23 (1972), 266–274.
Sneed, J. D.: [Mathematical Physics] The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Dordrecht 1971.
Stegmüller, W.: Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Vol. II: Theorie und Erfahrung, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1970.
Stegmüller, W.: ‘Das Problem der Induktion: Hume's Herausforderung und moderne Antworten’, in H. Lenk (ed.), Neue Aspekte der Wissenschaftstheorie, Braunschweig 1971, 13–74.
Stegmüller, W.: Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Vol. IV: Personelle und Statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit. First half volume: Personelle Wahrscheinlichkeit und rationale Entscheidung. Second half volume: Statistisches Schließen-Statistische Begründung-Statistische Analyse, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1973.
Stegmüller, W.: [Theoriendynamik] Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Vol. II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Second half volume: Theorienstrukturen undTheoriendynamik, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1973.
Stegmüller, W.: ‘Theoriendynamik und logisches Verständnis’, in: W. Diederich (ed.), Theorien der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Frankfurt a. Main 1974, 167–209.
Stegmüller, W.: Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie, fifth ed. Stuttgart 1975, 2d Vol., Chapter V.
Watkins, J. ‘Against ‘Normal Science’’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970, 25–37.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stegmüller, W. Structures and dynamics of theories. Erkenntnis 9, 75–100 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223134
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223134