Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ancestral and current-generation inbreeding in an experimental strawberry breeding population

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Progenies from first-generation self, half-sib, full-sib, and cross fertilizations were generated to evaluate the magnitude of inbreeding depression for vegetative and production traits in strawberry. Tests were conducted to determine the linearity of trait mean depression with inbreeding rate (ΔF) over this range of inbreeding values, as an indication of the presence of non-additive epistasis. A control population, for which a similar range of coancestry had accumulated over several cycles of breeding and selection, was also generated to compare the consequences of ancestral and current-generation inbreeding. Trait means for crosses among current-generation half-sibs, full-sibs, and selfs were 2–17%, 3–12%, and 14–45% lower than for unrelated crosses among the same set of parents, respectively. Linear regression of progeny means on current generation ΔF was significantly negative for all traits and explained 17–44% of the variance among progeny means. Mean depression was largely linear over the range of inbreeding rates tested in this population, indicating the absence of epistasis for the traits evaluated. Conversely, (F) regressions of progeny means on pedigree inbreeding coefficients, where coancestry had accumulated over several cycles of breeding and selection, were uniformly non-significant and explained 0–10% of the variance among cross means. Further, multiple regression of progeny means for current-generation relatives on pedigree F failed to improve fit significantly over regression on current-generation ΔF alone for all traits. Together, these results suggest that pedigree inbreeding coefficients are poor predictors of changes in homozygosity when populations are developed through multiple cycles of breeding and selection. They also imply that inbreeding depression will be of minor importance for strawberry breeding populations managed with adequate population sizes and strong directional selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalders LE, Craig DL (1968) General and specific combining ability in seven inbred strawberry lines. Can J Genet Cytol 10:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalders LE, Craig DL (1974) Analysis of fruit yield and related factors in a diallel of seven inbred strawberry clones. Can J Genet Cytol 16:381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringhurst RS, Voth V (1984) Breeding octoploid strawberries. Iowa State J Res 58(4):371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock RE, Kelleher T, Morrow EB (1958) Genetic variation in an asexual species, the garden strawberry. Genetics 43:634–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius PL, Dudley JW (1974) Effects of inbreeding by selfing and full-sib mating in a maize population. Crop Sci 14:815–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliohu NG, Goddard ME, Taylor JF (1989) Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Theor Appl Genet 77:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Sears JH (1973) Changes in quantitative traits associated with inbreeding in a synthetic variety of maize. Crop Sci 13:327–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JF, and Siefker JH (1982) Levels of inbreeding in highbush blueberry cultivars. HortScience 17:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones DF, Singleton WR (1940) The improvement of naturally cross pollinated plants by selection in self-fertilized lines: III. Investigations with vegetatively propagated fruits. Conn Agric Exp Bull 435:329–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville AH, Galletta GJ, Draper AD, Ng TJ (1980) Seed germination and early seedling vigor in inbred strawberry selections. HortScience 15:749–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza HA, Haynes FL (1974) Genetic relationship between potato cultivars grown in the United States. HortScience 9:328–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow EB, Darrow GM (1952) The effect of limited inbreeding in strawberries. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 59:269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkoong G (1979) Introduction to quantitative genetics in forestry. US Dept Agric Tech Bull No. 1588

  • Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (1989) Preliminary studies on inbreeding in strawberry. Acta Hortic 265:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A (1961) Inbreeding in artificial selection programs. Genet Res 2:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1988) SAS/STAT users guide, release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R, Melenbacher SA, Lightner GW (1985) Inbreeding and coancestry of freestone peach cultivars of the eastern United States and implications for peach germplasm improvement. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110:547–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DV, Bringhurst RS, Voth V (1987) Genetic variation for quality traits in an advanced cycle breeding population of strawberries. J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 112:699–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DV, Bringhurst RS, Voth V (1989) Genetic parameters estimated for an advanced-cycle strawberry breeding population at two locations. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114:823–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DV (1991) Recent advances in the genetics of strawberry. In: Dale A, Luby JJ (eds) The strawberry into the 21st century. Timber Press, Inc. Portland, Oregon, pp. 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DV (1993) Genetic correlations between vegetative growth traits and productivity at different within season intervals for strawberries (Fragariaxananassa). Theor Appl Genet 85:1001–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjulin TM, Dale A (1987) Genetic diversity of North American strawberry cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 112:375–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezko RA, Zobel BJ (1988) Seedling height and diameter variation of various degrees of inbred and outcross progenies of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet 37:50–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangelo LPS, Hsu CS, Fejer SO, Watkins R (1971) Inbred line X tester analysis and the potential of inbreeding in strawberry breeding. Can J Genet Cytol 13:460–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrier E, Colleau JJ, Fouley JL (1990) Predicting cumulated response to directional selection in finite panmictic populations. Theor Appl Genet 79:833–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox MD (1983) Inbreeding depression and genetic variances estimated from self and cross-pollinated families of Pinus radiata. Silvae Genet 32:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods JH, Heaman JC (1989) Effects of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 19:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray NR, Woolliams JA, Thompson R (1990) Methods for predicting rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Theor Appl Genet 80:503–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright AJ, Cockerham CC (1986) Selection with partial selfing. II. Family selection. Crop Sci 26:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. L. Kahler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, D.V. Comparison of ancestral and current-generation inbreeding in an experimental strawberry breeding population. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 90, 237–241 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222207

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222207

Key words

Navigation