Skip to main content
Log in

Maximum-likelihood models for mapping genetic markers showing segregation distortion. 1. Backcross populations

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A maximum-likelihood approach is used in order to estimate recombination fractions between markers showing segregation distortion in backcross populations. It is assumed that the distortions are induced by viability differences between gametes or zygotes due to one or more selected genes. We show that Bailey's (1949) estimate stays consistent and efficient under more general assumptions than those defined by its author. This estimate should therefore be used instead of the classical maximum-likelihood estimate. The question of detection of linkage is also discussed. We show that the order of markers on linkage groups may be affected by segregation distortion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey NTJ (1949) The estimation of linkage with differential viability, II and III. Heredity 3:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey NTJ (1951) Testing the solubility of maximum likelihood equations in the routine application of scoring methods. Biometrics 7:268–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AWF (1972) Likelihood. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Dorado A, Gallego A (1992) On the use of the classical tests for detecting linkage. J. Hered 83:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Green P (1987) Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2363–2367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop GM, Lalouel J-M (1988) Efficient computations in multilocus linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 42:498–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyttle TW (1991) Segregation distorters. Annu Rev Genet 25:511–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K (1957) The measurement of linkage in heredity. Methuen and Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann PE (1990) Two-locus linkage analysis using recombinant inbred strains and Bayes' theorem. Genetics 126:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott J (1985) Analysis of human genetic linkage. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön CG, Hayes PM, Blake TK, Knapp SJ (1991) Gametophytic selection in a winter x spring barley cross. Genome 34:918–922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres AM, Mau-Lastovicka T, Williams TE, Soost RK (1985) Segregation distortion and linkage of Citrus and Poncirus isozyme genes. J Hered 76:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel JF, Parks CR (1984) Distorted segregation and linkage of alcohol dehydrogenase ec-1.1.1.1 genes in camellia-japonica theaceae. Biochem Genet 22:739–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivy M, Devaux P, Blaisonneaux J, Jean R, Thiellement H (1992) Segregation distortion and linkage studies in microspore-derived double haploid lines of Hordeum vulgare L. Theor Appl Genet 83:919–924

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorieux, M., Goffinet, B., Perrier, X. et al. Maximum-likelihood models for mapping genetic markers showing segregation distortion. 1. Backcross populations. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 90, 73–80 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220998

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220998

Key words

Navigation