Abstract
Modern botanical idiotaxonomy and syntaxonomy have both common and differing features. The common features are a pragmatic approach and an accent on conditional units, especially the species and the association. The differing features are in the nature of organismic and the coenotic levels of life. Taxonomy is based on a stronger genetical and phylogenetical relationship between taxa, which are thus not quite artifical and the scope of the species concept is roughly the same all over the world. The hierarchy in taxonomy reflects a phylogeny at least to some extent. The basis of syntaxonomy is entirely conventional owing to the continuous nature of vegetation. As a result, the scope of the association concept varies with different national schools, and the hierarchy in syntaxonomy is of a pragmatical, at best of an ecological nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkman, J.J., Moravec, J. & Rauschert, S. 1986. Code of phytosociological nomenclature. Vegetatio 32: 131–185.
Grant, W. 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia Univ. Press. N.Y.
Jeffry, C. 1982. An introduction to plant taxonomy. 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge.
Kopecký, K. & Hejný, S. 1974. A new approach to the classification of anthropogenetic plant communities. Vegetatio 29: 17–20.
Matuszkiewicz, W. 1981. Textbook for identification of the plant communities of Poland. PWN, Warzawa (in Polish).
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mirkin, B.M. 1985. The theoretical basis of modern phytocoenology. Nauka., Moskwa (in Russian).
Mirkin, B.M. 1987a. Paradigm change and vegetation classification in Soviet phytocoenology. Vegetatio 68: 131–138.
Mirkin, B.M. 1987b. On some theoretical aspects of the modern ecological-floristical classification development. Bull. M.O.I.P. 92: 74–87 (in Russian).
Moravec, J. et al. 1983. Red list of plant communities of the Czech Socialist Republic and their endangerment. Severoĉes. Přír. Litomêřice, Příl. 1: 1–128 (in Czech).
Noy-Meir, I. & van derMaarel, E. 1987. Relations between community theory and community analyses in vegetation science: some historical perspectives. Vegetatio 69: 5–15.
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. 1984. Order out of chaos. Heinemann, London.
Ramenski, L.G. 1924. Principal appropriateness of vegetation cover and its investigation. Vestnik opytnogo dela, Voronege, pp. 37–73 (in Russian).
Ramenski, L.G. 1952. On some principle standings of modern geobotany Bot. Zhur. 37: 181–201 (in Russian).
Schubert, R. 1976. Übersicht über die wichtigsten Gruppen der Pflanzengesellschaften. In: Rothmaler, W. (ed.), Exkursionsflora. Kritischer Band, pp. 20–45. Volk und Wissen, Berlin.
Simberloff, D., 1980. A succession of paradigm in ecology: essentialism to materialism and probabylism. Synthese 43: 3–39.
Sudnik-Wojcikowska, B. 1987. Iva xanthifolia Nutt. and its communities within Warszawa. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 56: 155–167.
Sukachov, V.N. 1957. The general principles and program for forest types investigation. In: Methodical recommendations for forest types investigation, pp. 9–63, A.S. USSR Press, Moskwa (in Russian).
Sykora, K.V. 1982. Syntaxonomy and synecology of the Lolio-Potentillion in the Netherlands. Acta Bot. Neerl. 31: 65–95.
Takhtajan, A.L. 1984. Preface to translation editor. In: Grant, W.,ed Plant speciation: pp. 5–9, Mir, Moskwa (in Russian).
Tikhomirov, V.N. 1985. About the system of flowering plants. Biol. Nauka 1: 16–24 (in Russian).
van derMaarel, E. 1980. Towards an ecological theory of nature management. In Verh. Ges. Ökol. 8: 13–24.
Whittaker, R.H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. 2nd ed. McMillan, New York.
Westhoff, V. & van derMaarel, E. 1978. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker, R.H. (ed.) Classification of plant communities, 2nd ed., pp. 287–399. Junk, The Hague.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirkin, B.M. Plant taxonomy and syntaxonomy: a comparative analysis. Vegetatio 82, 35–40 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00217980
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00217980